[RamKaNam]

When they announced #GTAV they used Adobe Photoshop CS5 (Macintosh) 2010/02/12-17:32:00
When they reveled new screens they used Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) 2012/02/06-14:56:27

CODE

PNG    IHDR   P       ÒÛ§   tEXtSoftware Adobe ImageReadyqÉe<  "iTXtXML:com.adobe.xmp     <?xpacket begin="" id="W5M0MpCehiHzreSzNTczkc9d"?> <x:xmpmeta xmlns:x="adobe:ns:meta/" x:xmptk="Adobe XMP Core 5.0-c060 61.134777, 2010/02/12-17:32:00        "> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="" xmlns:xmp="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/" xmlns:xmpMM="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/mm/" xmlns:stRef="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/sType/ResourceRef#" xmp:CreatorTool="Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh" xmpMM:InstanceID="xmp.iid:D4AD01DBFDB911E0A9BBB7CFFE3D960C" xmpMM:DocumentID="xmp.did:D4AD01DCFDB911E0A9BBB7CFFE3D960C"> <xmpMM:DerivedFrom stRef:instanceID="xmp.iid:D4AD01D9FDB911E0A9BBB7CFFE3D960C" stRef:documentID="xmp.did:D4AD01DAFDB911E0A9BBB7CFFE3D960C"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> </x:xmpmeta> <?xpacket end="r"?>q]A  FIDATxÚÜYÑ�ƒ0�°BnV #t F #ÀÇ0Â1Â1B�#•©"dÐ{’Jl̫㇃†¡pˆ™EĺYK†H»Nåb‹tE.wÈ]Ýó©ù>á·Öãøb?ÒÑ°O@9Kâz0Z¦Ð�ö­Ä{LIå@œ"¦­0�‡A‚O 1œ¿zU¨ü~µªÚåû±Þð“L¡Ì{ض‡~VyV=:°©âäB5ÞÞ÷`ߎDDì°Ü�o1šD|$\–„“›À9!gòŒWøÇ›­ê(.¦¸2JUg(a-›ƒÀéé… œ^KÖâ¡õG'f„ È“É£·Ú‹ò‰8,•.°•C&E7ù„\=0#*àÎXiõ¬•`h7ÜŸò‘\¶D_ÉÞ¿\B®ìÙ[ú<;�S³Å%ÿœ*ò¢ Þ­?â>sÀ n„�xcî±K¤µDŽ6 ¥è­ïà_I`pŸ'ïl¶èêlK µƒ:“HGTÌÑG^�åt²e¢i<GÉ—H­Æ=1®ÙNJÔPð:yò&Ÿ\@$© "_Y‰±açTÜ*Œm¡êdM9‚>�–Úu“X ßñd  Á‰$&@HHTX,Ö¨NꞸx'.ÛI¿0µL’¤M,ï€x^)Ž‚ªš/±ïËa1ZW“ÈÒ6¨ÄäÒYî¢DèßA4ø%߀ì_a..ÁîÐ'4¢[ÍŒBø'À Ú'¯ñCCÑ    IEND®B`‚

CODE

‰PNG    IHDR   ¨      õô×   tEXtSoftware Adobe ImageReadyqÉe<  "iTXtXML:com.adobe.xmp     <?xpacket begin="" id="W5M0MpCehiHzreSzNTczkc9d"?> <x:xmpmeta xmlns:x="adobe:ns:meta/" x:xmptk="Adobe XMP Core 5.3-c011 66.145661, 2012/02/06-14:56:27        "> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="" xmlns:xmp="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/" xmlns:xmpMM="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/mm/" xmlns:stRef="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/sType/ResourceRef#" xmp:CreatorTool="Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)" xmpMM:InstanceID="xmp.iid:2A018431E89311E19D1CAFD72BA9526A" xmpMM:DocumentID="xmp.did:2A018432E89311E19D1CAFD72BA9526A"> <xmpMM:DerivedFrom stRef:instanceID="xmp.iid:2A01842FE89311E19D1CAFD72BA9526A" stRef:documentID="xmp.did:2A018430E89311E19D1CAFD72BA9526A"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> </x:xmpmeta> <?xpacket end="r"?>žfÎ  ~IDATxÚì\‹mò06VÈ ééét„0B!Œ@F€`2¡Œ�?‘οåÇÙ>—GúIUçÇ}þ|gVã82 (2nSé©äÿz¨ç¯�`þd–gÕTÖPrËûŽS9ë/™0uSé ˜ì×`Ãò Ð[ûCê0a«8çQ¶¿>kA<\õ¤áϬ J)¦rýñ3•f*¹Æ&E³ýÚ`¯ã1Ûß[ÚOQ‡@õ$¶÷_��õ$á×,³`¿/r˜mÃŒ‹­c¶¿‡’9¨ÍÕÑþwBMÜWrþpå '‡cã�t^×�Ø:jèKHÔÓ‚HÚ�)¸âx—ñ3Äkì'Su`Fc˜ ”$mBЊ(þMŸLqº)™ØB’"c �« ‰ÍF ¢[G:)`–®¶Ì|Lb¶²8¦„~ç†çr@¿<�é³û‘Ò¶:–±¢AÏF+� [-¸M¢Q8‚ãÒþÀUj›-p% kËgkd²Á"Ë£lËh"’¤düሙqF<ÿ€×�aë¢q(Dï°¿ÑÌ®DÛ0°©pΖƒ&Q£øÃ¥äÅWºUÿÒȸ,ç¦e½G’è(³#Äžý!&îNÆŸá b±Þ3È•c¹<pv©›©P,��7�_jÑÀNð(þdH©5 àµw­t(ã3d±±=Þ;'»'°½3(f› 1æ—f“ϲY²ÝÂÖÑlT„�ú Ì}8<ùJ…ÞпŠùo´'ãWf_èÅq s‡çˆDã·.�Œ–r°´oμL>ßÚŠâת=�*ÉòÅ‹ªËŽ½?C?drÃRó‡kó ÙrŒz”R|Ó¿ØÎz)×ü:ƒ¯C¶�Èù“YÝÁLY¸H&°ŠXƒì‡$O�ÀÔ$dou•°]«Äý'=�€4¤'áO†X:)&S3ß’ÙÏÄK‡ä»žSOM°ï] Äs¥QÑ%ŒæOFàô¹ —Àl}íAÐ"p°¾4 @mÈ^×ož¹»’œ‹aÜSŠ†•?Ü ­>˯kôfq:æŒÀ¼]Yü-&[òÓ²å‚*1$åWf æâä̽oÖY>‹¹‚'®îðwQKl’½¾vÉaþp)ÖPoB‹MÔ Ñ(“rž%I?[âPS=Ó_~D� âMŽHuiâpTÑdüÉ,1™ HÅî_*4Ïl�·Œ t"·�t�êpe|1K’pDk˜Ñ-ûÿ•c@°Ç’)m›Ttí±L§åܽ»Œ´ø�; êÝ¿šÐ~IpŸòjù\™ð‹mêýËGØ®w4±_ÎKÎî' ”[,߆Œ»óT&“úQœXü%Lö,ûèé�$üáJ%1ç©" ùt4¶ƒºB¶ŒÄIÕÞ©íjÕwu^yÛéæIRrþp�¢|BEƒ§á­yΞõÈö‡Ž°©èR¦! Ž%çÏñÓ7%»U•ŠÁ�Ý�#VÑD=rb$Û^ê Ï«#š?ÿ »�”µ ±    IEND®B`‚

[Frantz Fuchs]

And this tells us...?

[Hvitdverg]

How do you read this HTML

[ivor1977]

HOLY sh*tSAUCE! THIS CAN ONLY MEAN ONE THING!!!

anyone??

[Freezer89]

Open images with a text editor, I guess.. and it's not html, lol.

Either way you are really getting desperate if you already trying to "decipher" the images through the codes.

[Tomson21]

...and the conclusion iiiiiiisss?

[xXTacoGuyXx]

QUOTE (Hvitdverg @ Sunday, Sep 9 2012, 17:53)

How do you read this HTML

Your browser's developer mode i'm pretty sure.

[Shockenheim]

The conclusion is. No GTA V this year.

[i am a girl on the internet]

Fu­ckin' a, good job.

[RamKaNam]

2010/02/12
2012/02/06

Or

2012/02/06
2010/02/12
-------------
13/8

[GTAmikkel]

omg stop... They wouldnt f*cking reveal the release date in an html code. Wake the f*ck up please

[LotusRIP]

QUOTE (RamKaNam @ Sunday, Sep 9 2012, 10:18)

2010/02/12 2012/02/06 Or 2012/02/06 2010/02/12 ------------- 13/8

Shut up and go watch The Matrix. This topic is sh*t, it tells us nothing, except that you have no life. There's no special codes here.

[RamKaNam]

This isn't about release date.

[UncleVlad]

QUOTE (RamKaNam @ Sunday, Sep 9 2012, 10:18)

2010/02/12 2012/02/06 Or 2012/02/06 2010/02/12 ------------- 13/8

I don't get it. What does 2010 have to with GTA V?

[Carl CJ Johnsons Brother Brian]

OH, THAT TELLS US INTERESTING THINGS!! IT'S FULL OF INFORMATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

OP: What do you want to tell us exactly?

[FRA1Z3R]

He is not trying to say there is a release date, by looking at this it should tell you when the events (screenshots and The announcement logo) took place if it is indeed real, which I highly doubt.

[i am a girl on the internet]

QUOTE (RamKaNam @ Sunday, Sep 9 2012, 10:29)

This isn't about release date.

I'm surprised that so few people actually noticed that. Then again, this is GTAForums.

[Kai Jellyboo]

it means that they made the screens on those dates. i think

[FRA1Z3R]

QUOTE (Kai Jellyboo @ Sunday, Sep 9 2012, 10:50)

it means that they made the screens on those dates. i think

From what I gather, it would be the time that the pages for the announcement and the screens were created... Thats the way i would understand it anyway. However, I am curious as to how the op could access the elements pictured.

[Toup]

They will call this year 0.