[fgcarva1]

Oh God... I really wish I studied more of the superstring theory in High School. That's why I posted this video on my Physics teacher's wall.

For sure not enough evidence. I still don't understand how he can confirm it is in fact a binary code that was found. And if it was, how can one "hack" or alternate it? It's essentially something that is naturally built. I don't understand much of this but the research is bound to be interesting.

[hristobg]

Fibonacci's Sequence! That's proven.

[ghost of delete key]

QUOTE (Adriaan @ Thursday, Aug 30 2012, 12:20)

Interesting video I saw on reddit today.

WHY do people still do this? It's 2012 for chrissake.

[zoo3891]

I doubt very many people here read TvTropes, but there was a forum topic once about hacking reality by cracking its code. Pretty fanciful, but what if someone somehow discovered how to understand, and edit the code of the universe? Can't find the thread, but it was an interesting concept.

@ghost of delete key
I KNOW, not capitalizing website names is SO yesteryear!

This post has been edited by zoo3891 on Friday, Aug 31 2012, 01:17

[hristobg]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr20wqKYYtQ

[ghost of delete key]

QUOTE (zoo3891 @ Thursday, Aug 30 2012, 21:08)

@ghost of delete key I KNOW, not capitalizing website names is SO yesteryear!

.
.
.

e_o

[bud23]

QUOTE (hristobg @ Friday, Aug 31 2012, 01:49)

Fibonacci's Sequence! That's proven.

That's a hasty thought,mate.We live in 2012,do you remember it?

I´m not going to say that Fibonacci's Sequence proves the intelligent design, because is 2012 and since nietzsche killed to god, we are our own god.

Actually the golden ratio and all its implications mean a sh*t. I don´t care if the human head forms a golden rectangle, or if the top of head to navel and elbows / length of forearm = Phi, or if each cycle of the DNA molecule measures 34 angstoms long by 21 angstroms wide. 34 and 21 are fibonacci numbers, as noted above. 34/21 is 1.619, approximating phi.
I don´t care if the whole Human Genome is controled by two BINARY CODES ATTRACTORS which provide a kind of self-organized bistable binary code like in computers.

I don´t care because people who think in the possibility of an Intelligent Design is stupid and lives in the stone age.
I live in 2012, I´m smart so I can´t believe in this sh*t.
Even if there amazing coincidences that could point to the possibility of intelligent design, I´m going to deny it irrationally. Why? Because if at the end there a god, I´m well f*cking. I prefer ignore this posibility and continue living like always, thinking that there is no god than myself.

Matrix;
-Trinity: I know why you're here, Neo. I know what you've been doing... why you hardly sleep, why you live alone, and why night after night, you sit by your computer. You're looking for him. I know because I was once looking for the same thing. And when he found me, he told me I wasn't really looking for him. I was looking for an answer. It's the question that drives us, Neo. It's the question that brought you here. You know the question, just as I did.

-Neo: What's the GTA V release date?

Trinity: The answer is out there, Neo, and it's looking for you, and it will find you if you want it to.

The time will come, Neo, please be patient.The answer is close.

[sivispacem]

QUOTE (bud23 @ Friday, Aug 31 2012, 14:47)

Actually the golden ratio and all its implications mean a sh*t.

The "golden ratio" aesthetic preference hypothesis has been largely discounted as myth. Jstor article. Applications of the Golden Mean to Architecture. From the latter, I quote directly-

QUOTE (Nikos A. Salingaros; The University of Texas at San Antonio)

This application of the Golden Mean to design contrasts with the unsatisfactory state of affairs — or rather, problems in finding any applications at all — when it comes to claims made in the architectural and popular literatures. Rectangles with aspect ratio the Golden Mean have no special meaning; most embarrassing for its numerous proponents is that the key examples used to illustrate this recurring theme turn out to be contrived. Claims for attractive properties of minimalist architecture, which dogmatically celebrates empty rectangles, are therefore nothing more than wishful thinking by its practitioners and their cult followers.

The latter article also contends that many of the buildings that are claimed by proponents of the "golden ratio" hypothesis to possess golden-ratio rectangles in fact do not.

QUOTE (bud23 @ Friday, Aug 31 2012, 14:47)

Even if there amazing coincidences that could point to the possibility of intelligent design, I´m going to deny it irrationally.

Try and avoid the use of emotive language when you discuss things like this, and people might take you seriously. "Amazing coincidences" can usually be explained scientifically and/or mathematically. They are therefore not coincidences. Moreover, I have never seen a single thing that has been presented as a coincidence, amazing or not, which anyone regardless of ability or will has been able to convincingly argue is evidence for intelligent design.