|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Petition against the CIA We The People, The White House
 |
|
 |
| |
sivispacem  |
Posted: Thursday, Aug 30 2012, 07:24
|
Wilderness of Mirrors

Group: The Connection
Joined: Feb 14, 2011



|
What I find most concerning about things like the Zeitgeist documentaries is that they don't actually seem to understand how the things they violently oppose work. It stands to reason that there's a great deal of secrecy surrounding the operations of the CIA because they're and intelligence agency- there's nothing conspiratorial about that. But the biggest issue is that these theories seem to be applied to an image of the US intelligence services (in particular) which is based not on reality, defined legal boundaries or history, but on myth, fiction and Hollywood blockbusters. The fact of the matter is- and there are many intelligence specialists in the US system who will wholeheartedly agree with me here- that the US intelligence system is fundamentally and technically flawed due to the rigid power boundaries which are enforced on it, and a history of hostility between domestic and international, between signals and human intelligence. Part of this is down to the partisan nature of US politics, part down to historic rivalry between agencies and competition for funding, and part down to the overarching concept in the United States that no one organisation of any kind should hold a monopoly on anything. Unfortunately, it doesn't actually work very well in reality. The history of the CIA is peppered with communication and analytical failures, poor judgements and examples of operational groups being outmanoeuvred (in more ways than one) by the corrupt intelligence apparatus of nations so poor their entire GDP is so small that it looks like a rounding error in the congressional hat budget. The most notable example of organisational ineptitude is, of course, 9/11, but there are many others- Operation Igloo White in Vietnam, conducted in collaboration with USAF intelligence; the strategic failure of Operational Barrel Roll in Vietnam, the failure to detect repeated penetration of the higher echelons of the CIA by Communist moles during the mid-Cold War period, the failure to protect US military secrets related to the US nuclear programme, which enabled the Soviet Union to design and build a thermonuclear weapon within a year of the US first testing theirs.
Put simply, the Zeitgeist documentaries are factually incorrect. The problem is that most of their viewers take them as canon and don't explore the issues around them in more detail. That's why academics and subject matter experts dismiss them as childish nonsense. I implore you, read some of the books dedicated to intelligence history, and you'll realise that many of the various operations in both peace and war the CIA was (and is) involved in are a) relatively benign, b) often quite unsuccessful and c) not in any way an infringement of their legal duties and responsibilities. Now, if you want something to be really paranoid, how about the British intelligence services? They were only acknowledged to exist in the early 1990s, have no public mandate and operate largely independently of political oversight unless embroiled in some kind of public accountability investigation. Then again, none of them have direct covert action capability like the CIA do, so it's not as if they're flying out to third-world nations and bumping off dictators.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
Chunk  |
Posted: Thursday, Aug 30 2012, 09:42
|
next level

Group: $outh $ide Hoodz
Joined: Oct 29, 2008

|
| QUOTE (sivispacem @ Thursday, Aug 30 2012, 08:24) | What I find most concerning about things like the Zeitgeist documentaries is that they don't actually seem to understand how the things they violently oppose work. It stands to reason that there's a great deal of secrecy surrounding the operations of the CIA because they're and intelligence agency- there's nothing conspiratorial about that. But the biggest issue is that these theories seem to be applied to an image of the US intelligence services (in particular) which is based not on reality, defined legal boundaries or history, but on myth, fiction and Hollywood blockbusters. The fact of the matter is- and there are many intelligence specialists in the US system who will wholeheartedly agree with me here- that the US intelligence system is fundamentally and technically flawed due to the rigid power boundaries which are enforced on it, and a history of hostility between domestic and international, between signals and human intelligence. Part of this is down to the partisan nature of US politics, part down to historic rivalry between agencies and competition for funding, and part down to the overarching concept in the United States that no one organisation of any kind should hold a monopoly on anything. Unfortunately, it doesn't actually work very well in reality. The history of the CIA is peppered with communication and analytical failures, poor judgements and examples of operational groups being outmanoeuvred (in more ways than one) by the corrupt intelligence apparatus of nations so poor their entire GDP is so small that it looks like a rounding error in the congressional hat budget. The most notable example of organisational ineptitude is, of course, 9/11, but there are many others- Operation Igloo White in Vietnam, conducted in collaboration with USAF intelligence; the strategic failure of Operational Barrel Roll in Vietnam, the failure to detect repeated penetration of the higher echelons of the CIA by Communist moles during the mid-Cold War period, the failure to protect US military secrets related to the US nuclear programme, which enabled the Soviet Union to design and build a thermonuclear weapon within a year of the US first testing theirs.
Put simply, the Zeitgeist documentaries are factually incorrect. The problem is that most of their viewers take them as canon and don't explore the issues around them in more detail. That's why academics and subject matter experts dismiss them as childish nonsense. I implore you, read some of the books dedicated to intelligence history, and you'll realise that many of the various operations in both peace and war the CIA was (and is) involved in are a) relatively benign, b) often quite unsuccessful and c) not in any way an infringement of their legal duties and responsibilities. Now, if you want something to be really paranoid, how about the British intelligence services? They were only acknowledged to exist in the early 1990s, have no public mandate and operate largely independently of political oversight unless embroiled in some kind of public accountability investigation. Then again, none of them have direct covert action capability like the CIA do, so it's not as if they're flying out to third-world nations and bumping off dictators. | You're way too smart for a forum like this, mate.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
Sanjeem  |
Posted: Thursday, Aug 30 2012, 13:59
|

Group: Members
Joined: Oct 11, 2008


|
| QUOTE (Chunk @ Thursday, Aug 30 2012, 09:42) | | QUOTE (sivispacem @ Thursday, Aug 30 2012, 08:24) | What I find most concerning about things like the Zeitgeist documentaries is that they don't actually seem to understand how the things they violently oppose work. It stands to reason that there's a great deal of secrecy surrounding the operations of the CIA because they're and intelligence agency- there's nothing conspiratorial about that. But the biggest issue is that these theories seem to be applied to an image of the US intelligence services (in particular) which is based not on reality, defined legal boundaries or history, but on myth, fiction and Hollywood blockbusters. The fact of the matter is- and there are many intelligence specialists in the US system who will wholeheartedly agree with me here- that the US intelligence system is fundamentally and technically flawed due to the rigid power boundaries which are enforced on it, and a history of hostility between domestic and international, between signals and human intelligence. Part of this is down to the partisan nature of US politics, part down to historic rivalry between agencies and competition for funding, and part down to the overarching concept in the United States that no one organisation of any kind should hold a monopoly on anything. Unfortunately, it doesn't actually work very well in reality. The history of the CIA is peppered with communication and analytical failures, poor judgements and examples of operational groups being outmanoeuvred (in more ways than one) by the corrupt intelligence apparatus of nations so poor their entire GDP is so small that it looks like a rounding error in the congressional hat budget. The most notable example of organisational ineptitude is, of course, 9/11, but there are many others- Operation Igloo White in Vietnam, conducted in collaboration with USAF intelligence; the strategic failure of Operational Barrel Roll in Vietnam, the failure to detect repeated penetration of the higher echelons of the CIA by Communist moles during the mid-Cold War period, the failure to protect US military secrets related to the US nuclear programme, which enabled the Soviet Union to design and build a thermonuclear weapon within a year of the US first testing theirs.
Put simply, the Zeitgeist documentaries are factually incorrect. The problem is that most of their viewers take them as canon and don't explore the issues around them in more detail. That's why academics and subject matter experts dismiss them as childish nonsense. I implore you, read some of the books dedicated to intelligence history, and you'll realise that many of the various operations in both peace and war the CIA was (and is) involved in are a) relatively benign, b) often quite unsuccessful and c) not in any way an infringement of their legal duties and responsibilities. Now, if you want something to be really paranoid, how about the British intelligence services? They were only acknowledged to exist in the early 1990s, have no public mandate and operate largely independently of political oversight unless embroiled in some kind of public accountability investigation. Then again, none of them have direct covert action capability like the CIA do, so it's not as if they're flying out to third-world nations and bumping off dictators. |
You're way too smart for a forum like this, mate. | Agreed, You're like a f*cking information database on almost every subject. You deserve true admiration.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
Greenline  |
Posted: Thursday, Aug 30 2012, 14:00
|
Page 3 Girl

Group: Members
Joined: Nov 1, 2011


|
| QUOTE (Johnny_Cash1983 @ Thursday, Aug 30 2012, 18:05) | FBI should be removed they Deleted Mega Upload. The bastards. |
Wow, you truly are in an oppressed nation. No other country has to go through what you guys go through, you have my full support. ----------- The thing about some Americans and some Europeans (well, extremely ignorant ones), is that they don't have problems. They don't know what oppression, corruption and dictatorships are, nor have most of them experienced one. Now, here's the thing, they try to use the unused brain capacity that's supposed to go into suffering etc., and then conspiracies are born. Just like OCD and other anxiety disorders are caused; by a person with a high IQ not using his brain to the max. Now, conspiracies are similar. Just instead of a high IQ, you have a spoiled people, living in a country with a completely functional system, trying to use that part of the brain that normally goes into dealing with oppression and dictatorships (problem solving), and just creating problems for yourself, so in the end that unused capacity is used trying to fight against imaginary corruption and oppression by the evil leaders etc. Atleast, that's my theory, and I think it's not so far from the truth. Don't be so spoiled, people.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
Johnny_Cash1983  |
Posted: Thursday, Aug 30 2012, 20:21
|
CopKilla

Group: Members
Joined: Apr 1, 2012

|
| QUOTE (Greenline @ Thursday, Aug 30 2012, 14:00) | | QUOTE (Johnny_Cash1983 @ Thursday, Aug 30 2012, 18:05) | FBI should be removed they Deleted Mega Upload. The bastards. |
Wow, you truly are in an oppressed nation. No other country has to go through what you guys go through, you have my full support. -----------
The thing about some Americans and some Europeans (well, extremely ignorant ones), is that they don't have problems. They don't know what oppression, corruption and dictatorships are, nor have most of them experienced one. Now, here's the thing, they try to use the unused brain capacity that's supposed to go into suffering etc., and then conspiracies are born. Just like OCD and other anxiety disorders are caused; by a person with a high IQ not using his brain to the max. Now, conspiracies are similar. Just instead of a high IQ, you have a spoiled people, living in a country with a completely functional system, trying to use that part of the brain that normally goes into dealing with oppression and dictatorships (problem solving), and just creating problems for yourself, so in the end that unused capacity is used trying to fight against imaginary corruption and oppression by the evil leaders etc. Atleast, that's my theory, and I think it's not so far from the truth.
Don't be so spoiled, people. | What are you trying to say?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
ghost of delete key  |
Posted: Thursday, Aug 30 2012, 21:06
|
ಠ_ಠ ... otter ...

Group: The Connection
Joined: Dec 27, 2003



|
| QUOTE (Callum @ Wednesday, Aug 29 2012, 20:12) | | So, I've been watching the Zeitgeist series, and well, it's a major eye-opener! |
Do your own thinking, but for the love of mustard, THINK. | QUOTE | | Before watching it I always loved the American system, |
...back when you still had rational thought... | QUOTE | | it seems that the people at the top are majorly corrupt, |
herp derp, welcome to the Human Race. Remember to apply this measure to those Zeitgeist freaks you latched onto, when they've got you hypnotized into giving up all your goodies to the Collective. Just sayin'... | QUOTE (funny as hell) | | I have setup a petition (click here) on the website of The White House, petitioning that the CIA should be either abolished (and replaced with something new) or reformed and ensure that everything is ran through The President of the United States. | OMG ur SRS?!?! | QUOTE | | Some of you may think I'm crazy and stupid, but meh, if you would, please sign the petition. It needs at least 150 votes to be publicly visible. |
I say we bump this vote to visible just for the public embarrassment Oh, wait- this was a troll? This post has been edited by ghost of delete key on Friday, Aug 31 2012, 16:16
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
Greenline  |
Posted: Thursday, Aug 30 2012, 21:24
|
Page 3 Girl

Group: Members
Joined: Nov 1, 2011


|
| QUOTE (Tyler @ Friday, Aug 31 2012, 01:42) | | There is a question being left unsaid here that seriously needs a voice at this point. | What about Anal?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Pages:
(3) 1 [2] 3
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
| |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|