I`m not going to lie RDR 1 was a `you either like it or not` type of game. It was a Wild West game, that, well was `dying`. I wasn`t a fan of the whole modernizing theme. However Mexico severed as a blast in the past, it felt like a spaghetti Western, mainly because I always wore a outfit similar to Clint Eastwood's in `The Good, The Bad, The Ugly" and everyone spoke a different language... and there was a rebellion, you gotta love that.
(Yes the host is a compelte and other c*nt, god dam he`s too charismatic...)
QUOTE (Rockstar Games)
We love Red Dead too - and are thrilled that so many of you loved John Marston's tale and are excited for more epic Western action. As we mentioned in our last set of Asked & Answereds to similar questions about the future of other game franchises like Bully and L.A. Noire, we don't always rush to make sequels but that does not mean that we won't get to them eventually. Stay tuned for further announcements about the future of the Red Dead series.
Well, Red Dead Redemption 2, I understand Red Dead revolver is the first of the Red Dead series. However I forgot through all the hype. I suppose the media has put it in my head now.. Red Dead Redemption two lol.
And we'll see ya, tomorrow night Group: Members
Joined: Jun 10, 2008
For RDR 2 I dont want it to just be called "Red Dead Redemption 2" Im almost 99% sure it will be "Red Dead Revolution" or something similar to that. And as for the game I would like it to either be a prequel to the original Red Dead showing John's days with Dutch's gang or to go way back to the Mid 1800s to a new location. I would prefer the new location option. Either way I would get it because I loved RDR and would love to see R* expand on it. But i think it will most likely be next gen.
I hope Red Dead 3 doesn't take place after Redemption. The west WAS dying, and I didn't like Blackwater as much as any of the other towns. It was too modern for a western game.
Luck. Runs. Out. Group: Andolini Mafia Family
Joined: Jun 19, 2005
Too soon? At the rate Rockstar is going with the release (or lack thereof) for GTA V then we might not even see it until the next generation of consoles.
For RDR 2 I dont want it to just be called "Red Dead Redemption 2" Im almost 99% sure it will be "Red Dead Revolution" or something similar to that. And as for the game I would like it to either be a prequel to the original Red Dead showing John's days with Dutch's gang or to go way back to the Mid 1800s to a new location. I would prefer the new location option. Either way I would get it because I loved RDR and would love to see R* expand on it. But i think it will most likely be next gen.
Honestly thats the way to f*cking go. Pre RDR, pre f*cking 1900`s in general. I want to be some bad-ass motherf*cking cowboy with no bloody remorse, like Marston felt him, or his crew used to be. What I loved was that the characters were 3D, as in they actually were believable, realistic and showed emotions. And if they do a pre to RDR game, we can see how sick and f*cked up R* will make the`Renegades` or at least thats what I think the gang was called.
And Im f*cking loling at these names bro. Ha ha Red Dead Rice Cakes, lol.
Gaming Chat
