|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Round 1: Black Swan vs. OUATINW
 |
|
 |
| |
Indi  |
Posted: Saturday, May 5 2012, 15:11
|
Cinemafique

Group: Andolini Mafia Family
Joined: Nov 22, 2008



|
I vote Once Upon a Time in the West.
Whilst Black Swan is a great psychological thriller, I still found it a bit weird in some parts. Psychological thrillers have never been my type of thing in a major way to be honest. Natalie Portman played the role in such greatness I can't fault that.
Once Upon a Time is directed by one of my favourite directors: Sergio Leone. The master of spaghetti westerns, including "A Fistful of Dollars", "The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly", and also "For A Few Dollars More." Henry Fonda plays as one of the most insane and most cruellest outlaws in the west. Charles Bronson is basically the "Man with No Name (Clint Eastwood)" in this flick, Charles Bronson is sent to kill Henry Fonda simply because he killed a whole family for his own selfish needs to gain more power and money. Well, that's the story in a nutshell at least.
The direction, the cinematography, the story, the actors and everything inside of the film is just sheer spaghetti western goodness. Claudia Cardinale is beautiful and is a fine actor indeed.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
Tycek  |
Posted: Saturday, May 5 2012, 19:58
|
Being a bastard works. [Y]

Group: Members
Joined: Jul 20, 2009


|
Many of the battle will be not only between movies, but also between directors. Here we can see the battle between two legendary (of course their fame level is hard to compare) directors. One of them is Siergio Leone well knows director not only of the best westerns, but also very memorable movies (who haven't heard about Fistful of Dollars (I almost wrote Hollars - damn you Rockstar), Good, Bad and Ugly, Once Upon Time In America or already mentioned here Once Upon Time In The West. The other one is Darren Aronofsky who was always directing more like shock movies.
Siergio Leone knew how to create perfect Western where almost every element was perfect both alone and in a complete picture. In OUTITW we got pefect acting (fantastic Henry Fonda, mysterious Chuck Bronson who could melt Chuck Norris with his eyes and beautiful Claudia Cardinale), we got perfect pictures of the west, we got beautiful music which can give you the creeps made as always by Ennio Morricone, memorable scenes.
Arnofsky on the other hand always try to shock viewers with some elements and because of that I found Dark Swan a bit hard to watch. Of course ballet scenes was beatiful, slow and gentle, music was very good, actresses were beautiful, but I found some elements a bit cliche. Nina as a ballet dancer with anorexia, paranoia, drug problems and hidden lesbian affection was a bit overweighted with her character creation. She was kind of how-many-problems-this-girl-can-have type of character. Her transition into black swan was also easy to discover even in early part of the movie. Gore elements like scene with finger skin or nail file were destroying the whole movie. On one hand gentle ballet and other woman who cut her cheeks with nail file? The best way to sumarize this movie is to quote Lily "It's not for everyone." Definitely not for me.
My vote goes to Once Upon Time In The West.
This post has been edited by Tycek on Saturday, May 5 2012, 21:27
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
Tyler  |
Posted: Saturday, May 5 2012, 20:58
|
Fatima

Group: Zaibatsu
Joined: Mar 22, 2009


|
First and foremost, get rid of them spoilers, Tycek. I'd be a bit pissed if I saw that before watching Once Upon a Time.
Both of these films are beautifully shot and acted, and it was quite hard to choose between them. On the one hand, you have a choreographed epic Western that I would call one of the finest of all time. Everything from the score to Henry Fonda's hat works perfectly. The pacing is slow and arid. It is an echo of the memorable old west. Scenes are grit-filled and tense. There's little actual violence compared to the build-up between them, and it works.
On the other, you have Black Swan. Darren Aronofsky is my favourite director for his ability to compose a story that is both rich in the setting and character development. You are put into the shoes of a young dancer as she descends into madness and stardom. You are pulled through tense scenes that are enough to have you looking at your nails to make sure they're okay. You're shown at least 40 minutes of a ballet and you aren't even mad.
Both films are masterpieces in their own right. I would recommend anyone that is unsure about seeing either of these, to do so immediately. In the end, I see them much on the same level, but the overall winner of the two- for me, is Black Swan.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
Robinski  |
Posted: Saturday, May 5 2012, 22:02
|
Under a fluorescent sky

Group: BUSTED!
Joined: Oct 26, 2007


|
| QUOTE (Tycek @ Saturday, May 5 2012, 19:58) | | Arnofsky on the other hand always try to shock viewers with some elements and because of that I found Dark Swan a bit hard to watch. Of course ballet scenes was beatiful, slow and gentle, music was very good, actresses were beautiful, but I found some elements a bit cliche. Nina as a ballet dancer with anorexia, paranoia, drug problems and hidden lesbian affection was a bit overweighted with her character creation. She was kind of how-many-problems-this-girl-can-have type of character. Her transition into black swan was also easy to discover even in early part of the movie. Gore elements like scene with finger skin or nail file were destroying the whole movie. On one hand gentle ballet and other woman who cut her cheeks with nail file? The best way to sumarize this movie is to quote Lily "It's not for everyone." Definitely not for me. | This is why I liked the film so much. There are only two real moments of character development (the night out with Lily and the final performance) but Aronofsky and Portman crafted such a deep character in Nina that it didn't matter. This is a girl who, behind the composed, paper-thin veneer is completely f*cked up, just like the profession she's in. And, upon watching the film a second time I think it's handled really well as to why. Nina's so f*cked up because she hates ballet: she only does it out of the guilt she feels for her mother's career, and the symptoms (the anorexia, the self-harm fantasies) are manifestations of her struggle to match up to said career. The paranoia and seeing doppelgangers of herself ( on the subway at the very start, and in the pedestrian underpass) is how her deep rooted wish to be someone else, or to have taken a different path, comes out. The scene when she comes home drunk/rolling's one of my favourite scenes, because you can see that she, if only for a while, sees what her mother's done to her. That's why I like the film so much, on the surface it's a very well produced psych-horror film about ballet, but underneath it's a very well produced psych-horror film about detesting ballet. But my opinion doesn't count because I haven't seen OUATITW, for all I know it makes Black Swan look as deep as a petri dish.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
Fnorg  |
|
OG

Group: Andolini Mafia Family
Joined: Feb 6, 2008

|
I really like both films a lot, but ultimately I'm just a sucker for epics. Compared to Leone's 'Dollars' trilogy, Once Upon a Time in the West is a much slower paced film and a lot more restrained in tone. It takes about 30 minutes until all main players are fully introduced, and it's not clear what the plot is until about an hour and a half into the film. The slow build-up works well as a means to build up tension. I was a bit underwhelmed with Bronson's character's angle, but it was a fun ride. The film's 'seriousness' works in its favor and it stacks up with modern westerns in terms of storytelling and characters, while still having time to show crazy, typical western stuff like the train-boot killing. Henry Fonda is great as Frank, the blood/power-thirsty hired gun and Bronson is a bad dude as always.
Robinski, you should at least watch the first the scene of the movie, maybe not for the sake of the competition but because it's f*cking incredible. It's a microcosm of the rest of the movie (aside from the lack of Ennio Morricone's awesome soundtrack). It's slow, it's calculated and it just plain looks great. It's my favorite scene of the entire movie. Look it up on YT, you won't regret it.
I hope Black Swan loses, if only for the creepy skin bullsh*t Aronofsky put me through. I've seen actual people get their heads cut off, mutilated bodies and what have you, but ripping skin off a hand? nopenopenopenope
I vote for Once Upon a Time in the West.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
Robinski  |
|
Under a fluorescent sky

Group: BUSTED!
Joined: Oct 26, 2007


|
| QUOTE (Fnorg @ Sunday, May 6 2012, 09:17) | Robinski, you should at least watch the first the scene of the movie, maybe not for the sake of the competition but because it's f*cking incredible. It's a microcosm of the rest of the movie (aside from the lack of Ennio Morricone's awesome soundtrack). It's slow, it's calculated and it just plain looks great. It's my favorite scene of the entire movie. Look it up on YT, you won't regret it. | Don't worry, it's on my list. To be specific, it's on this list, which I'm working my way through. | QUOTE | | I hope Black Swan loses, if only for the creepy skin bullsh*t Aronofsky put me through. I've seen actual people get their heads cut off, mutilated bodies and what have you, but ripping skin off a hand? nopenopenopenope |
Haha, I don't know anyone who didn't cringe at that bit. It's because it's something so normal (like picking at dry skin or biting your nails) gone oh so horribly wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
Marlowe.  |
|
I Still Jerk-off Manually

Group: Members
Joined: Aug 24, 2011


|
Aronofsky deserves a lot of credit for turning a predictable ballet story, appropriately fitting day-time T.V., into a very watchable and enjoyable movie. Before I reluctantly watched Black Swan, I was gearing up to hate everything about it, sub the lesbian sex scene (which FYI, was infact the second biggest disappointment, just behind Portman's much hyped performance), but I actually sat through the while thing without ever leaving my seat (a rare feat for my ADD self). So, good Job Darren! Still, having said that, I still feel as if there is nothing incredibly remarkable about the film [Black Swan] that makes it stand out compared to the operatic epic that is - Once Upon a Time in the West.
Once Upon a Time is a simple film plot-wise. It's so simple infact, I can barely recall it. Something to do with land and train tracks (there's probably some sort of metaphor connecting the slow pace and the slow, dying end of the west - but I don't know). I tried to locate my DVD copy in order to be prepared for this but I couldn't find it, so I'm forced to piece together the movie in my fragile mind. What mostly stands out is how awesome the cinematography and score were - visually and musically it's the best western, and Leonne knew this, which is why the film is so long; he just lets the camera and Morricone's music do all of the talking, like a Western opera. I also recall how evil Henry Fonda was, how badass Charles Bronson was, and how smoking hot Claudia Cardinale was.
Once Upon a Time is a movie that will forever be sketched in my mind.
Marlowe. votes Once Upon a Time in the West
This post has been edited by Marlowe. on Sunday, May 6 2012, 14:57
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
| |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|