IMG

 
IMG
IMG   IMG
  Welcome to GTAForums! Be sure to check out the Grand Theft Auto V Forum.

You are not registered! (If you are, click here to login) Registering is fast, free and easy and allows you to instantly reply to any topic on GTAForums.
Why wait? Click here to register your own unique username and become part of the ever-growing community!


( Log In | Register | Revalidate Validation E-mail )
Quick Log-In:
  IMG
       
>

Pages: (6) « First ... 4 5 [6]   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 CJ the Antagonist?

 Have anyone thought about that?
 
Jemoni2012  
Posted: Sunday, Apr 22 2012, 15:22
Quote Post


The Psycho
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Apr 14, 2012

lt.gif

XXXXX



Ok, a Breakdown for pepole:
There are 3 GTA eras: The Original Era (2D era), The III Era (The 3D era) and the IV Era (The HD Era), each of which contain their own GTA games and each of those games contain their own cities.

2D era: GTA I and II
3D era: II, Vice City and San Andreas
HD era: IV and (presumebaly) V.

Henceforth the changes:

In GTA I SA was a city based on San Francisco, and LC and VC had nothing notable.

Skip forth to the 3D era: LC had three islands, each had their own name but it had no notable landmarks, VC had 2 islands, also named, and SA was a state containing 3 cities (Los Santos, San Fierro and Las Venturas) and the countryside and it had some notable landmarks.

Skip forth to the HD era: Starting off with the only thing we really know about: LC. It had a majorly revamped city, had notable landmarks from New York, from which it was based, and it also had three (four?) islands, each with a DIFFERENT name than from III.

Therefore, it is possible, that maybe characters from IV might return, but not from any of the previous places. Hell, GTA V will probably have a revamped LS, revamped countryside and it may not even contain Grove Street, hence some places with info about there being different names to the counties and mountains, also why SF and LV might not return, but the notable landmarks still return.

END RANT
PM
  Top
 

 
jnzooger  
Posted: Sunday, Apr 22 2012, 15:29
Quote Post


Just one of those days...
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Jun 12, 2005

us.gif

XXXXX



@Jemoni2012: You got all that right as far as GTA1, the III-era, and IV, however you neglect the fact that GTA2 had nothing to do with GTA1 as far as story goes.

Rockstar was only talking about the consoles when they said 2D/3D/HD. They said characters can't move between those consoles because it would look wrong.

So yes, there are 3 console eras right now, but there are also 4 story eras, 5 when V comes out most likely.
PMMSNAOLYahooXbox LivePlayStation Network
  Top
 

 
Jemoni2012  
Posted: Sunday, Apr 22 2012, 15:44
Quote Post


The Psycho
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Apr 14, 2012

lt.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (jnzooger @ Sunday, Apr 22 2012, 15:29)
@Jemoni2012: You got all that right as far as GTA1, the III-era, and IV, however you neglect the fact that GTA2 had nothing to do with GTA1 as far as story goes.

Rockstar was only talking about the consoles when they said 2D/3D/HD. They said characters can't move between those consoles because it would look wrong.

So yes, there are 3 console eras right now, but there are also 4 story eras, 5 when V comes out most likely.

I can make you a time era of the III era:
1. Vice City
2. San Andreas
3. III

I don't mean how they were released, I mean by what times they were set in. and III is the latest one of the era because In San Andreas Catalina goes with Claude and then while they are robbing a bank in the III( beggining, she shoots him and runs away, later to be killed.
PM
  Top
 

 
Da Perzinga  
Posted: Sunday, Apr 22 2012, 15:51
Quote Post


Perzinga_AuStRiA1998
Group Icon
Group: BUSTED!
Joined: Nov 6, 2011

at.gif

XXXXX



No, just no. I don't think that anyone of the old characters make a return. Maybe a few people from IV but not GTA I/II/London 1969/London1961/III/VC/SA/Advance/LCS/VCS. sarcasm.gif

EDIT: I don't unterstand why Catalina is in III light-skinned and in SA dark-skinned? notify.gif PS: No, I'm not a racist. tounge.gif

This post has been edited by Da Perzinga on Sunday, Apr 22 2012, 15:55
PM
  Top
 

 
Gregers08  
Posted: Sunday, Apr 22 2012, 16:05
Quote Post


Soldier
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Mar 7, 2011

XXXXX



Wont happen but it would be an interesting idea to have to go against someone we've played with in the past especially if it comes to the point where we'll have to kill them.

I would love an antagonist like Alonzo from traning day he doesn't exactly have to be an officer he could be a business partner or fellow criminal, the main thing is you question his loyalty through out the game but his twisted charisma keeps you on his side until he eventually betrays you.
PM
  Top
 

 
CheesyJ  
Posted: Sunday, Apr 22 2012, 16:12
Quote Post


Mack Pimp
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Jul 7, 2011

XXXXX



QUOTE (Jemoni2012 @ Sunday, Apr 22 2012, 15:22)
Ok, a Breakdown for pepole:
There are 3 GTA eras: The Original Era (2D era), The III Era (The 3D era) and the IV Era (The HD Era), each of which contain their own GTA games and each of those games contain their own cities.

2D era: GTA I and II
3D era: II, Vice City and San Andreas
HD era: IV and (presumebaly) V.

Henceforth the changes:

In GTA I SA was a city based on San Francisco, and LC and VC had nothing notable.

Skip forth to the 3D era: LC had three islands, each had their own name but it had no notable landmarks, VC had 2 islands, also named, and SA was a state containing 3 cities (Los Santos, San Fierro and Las Venturas) and the countryside and it had some notable landmarks.

Skip forth to the HD era: Starting off with the only thing we really know about: LC. It had a majorly revamped city, had notable landmarks from New York, from which it was based, and it also had three (four?) islands, each with a DIFFERENT name than from III.

Therefore, it is possible, that maybe characters from IV might return, but not from any of the previous places. Hell, GTA V will probably have a revamped LS, revamped countryside and it may not even contain Grove Street, hence some places with info about there being different names to the counties and mountains, also why SF and LV might not return, but the notable landmarks still return.

END RANT

Good post. Sums it up well and helps to clear it up for some people.
PM
  Top
 

 
jnzooger  
Posted: Sunday, Apr 22 2012, 16:14
Quote Post


Just one of those days...
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Jun 12, 2005

us.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (Jemoni2012 @ Sunday, Apr 22 2012, 15:44)
QUOTE (jnzooger @ Sunday, Apr 22 2012, 15:29)
@Jemoni2012: You got all that right as far as GTA1, the III-era, and IV, however you neglect the fact that GTA2 had nothing to do with GTA1 as far as story goes.

Rockstar was only talking about the consoles when they said 2D/3D/HD. They said characters can't move between those consoles because it would look wrong.

So yes, there are 3 console eras right now, but there are also 4 story eras, 5 when V comes out most likely.

I can make you a time era of the III era:
1. Vice City
2. San Andreas
3. III

I don't mean how they were released, I mean by what times they were set in. and III is the latest one of the era because In San Andreas Catalina goes with Claude and then while they are robbing a bank in the III( beggining, she shoots him and runs away, later to be killed.

Your point? I don't know why you bring up the timeline at all, it has nothing to do with what I said.

I say story era for the sake of people that say era. I really mean canon when I say that. Everyone and their mother knows that VC was set before SA which in turn was set before III. That makes up most of the III-canon which is part of the 3D-console era. However, the 2D game, GTA Advance is also part of that canon, and that era just because of the story.

IV on the other hand starts both a new canon and is on the start of a new era of consoles. That has nothing to do with the timeframe it is set in.
PMMSNAOLYahooXbox LivePlayStation Network
  Top
 

 
Irish85God  
Posted: Sunday, Apr 22 2012, 22:44
Quote Post


Player Hater
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Mar 25, 2012

il.gif

XXXXX



i highly doubt it
PMPlayStation Network
  Top
 

 
dont_feed_the_troll  
Posted: Sunday, Apr 22 2012, 22:59
Quote Post


Dont_feed_the_troll
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Apr 22, 2012

us.gif

XXXXX



LOL guys LOL lol.gif
Users WebsitePM
  Top
 

 
Degrees  
Posted: Sunday, Apr 22 2012, 23:24
Quote Post


Li'l G Loc
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Nov 2, 2011

XXXXX



People just want to take everything away from CJ. To hell with you all CJ worked hard for what he got.

But yeah he was probably the second worse didn't care for Jonny out of L&D that much tbh.
PM
  Top
 

 

0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

0 Members:

Pages: (6) « First ... 4 5 [6] 

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll
Search topic for posted by (exact match)



 
IMG IMG