IMG

 
IMG
IMG   IMG
  Welcome to GTAForums! Be sure to check out the Grand Theft Auto V Forum.

You are not registered! (If you are, click here to login) Registering is fast, free and easy and allows you to instantly reply to any topic on GTAForums.
Why wait? Click here to register your own unique username and become part of the ever-growing community!


( Log In | Register | Revalidate Validation E-mail )
Quick Log-In:
  IMG
       
>

Pages: (8) « First ... 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... Last »  ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 los santos only finally confirmed by rockstar

 yes no LV or SF
 
Jeeebuuus  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 03:47
Quote Post


AKA So-crates
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Nov 3, 2011

mars.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (Gtaghost22 @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 03:43)
QUOTE (Jeeebuuus @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 03:31)
Obviously it won't be close to Just Cause 2. Did you still have to make that so big?

Most of Just Cause 2's map was a copy & pasted repetitive sh*t! , it was fun though..

I meant the size of JC2 like the size of his picture is really, hugely big.
PM
  Top
 

 
Gtaghost22  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 03:51
Quote Post


The 7-8 Lions
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Dec 22, 2011

uk.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (Jeeebuuus @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 03:47)
QUOTE (Gtaghost22 @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 03:43)
QUOTE (Jeeebuuus @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 03:31)
Obviously it won't be close to Just Cause 2. Did you still have to make that so big?

Most of Just Cause 2's map was a copy & pasted repetitive sh*t! , it was fun though..

I meant the size of JC2 like the size of his picture is really, hugely big.

Yeah.. I know what you mean! I'm just saying GTA V doesnt need a map that big.. A map 2x times bigger than San Andreas with so much detail (like we saw in the trailer) is fine by me
PMPlayStation Network
  Top
 

 
Miamivicecity  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 03:52
Quote Post


The young and stupid get tricked by the old and bitter...
Group Icon
Group: Zaibatsu
Joined: Oct 14, 2007

au.gif

Member Award




Wow. You don't realize how small GTA III actually is. Some of these newer maps are monsters, but I hope GTA V isn't too big.

JC2 was like a chore to get around. It should be big enough to satisfy R*'s claim that it's their biggest map ever made, but it shouldn't be so big that it's literally boring to explore.

This post has been edited by Miamivicecity on Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 03:54
Users WebsitePMXbox LivePlayStation Network
  Top
 

 
zzcool  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 04:30
Quote Post


Big Homie
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Feb 15, 2009

sd.gif

Member Award




QUOTE (Miamivicecity @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 03:52)
Wow. You don't realize how small GTA III actually is. Some of these newer maps are monsters, but I hope GTA V isn't too big.

JC2 was like a chore to get around. It should be big enough to satisfy R*'s claim that it's their biggest map ever made, but it shouldn't be so big that it's literally boring to explore.

i liked that but it also got very repeatitive which is something i didn't like
PMMSNAOLYahooXbox LivePlayStation Network
  Top
 

 
Sirwest299  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 04:38
Quote Post


Player Hater
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: May 21, 2010

XXXXX



If it was only Los Santos, he would have just gone straight to the point and said "Yes it will be only Los Santos" but he didn't. This doesn't prove anything.
PM
  Top
 

 
gtasadude  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 05:29
Quote Post


Film Editor/Director
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Oct 29, 2005

XXXXX



Didn't you guys watch the trailer? The shot with the digger on the right and the city in the distance, that's probably less than half the size of the city alone and it was massive. The countryside looks huge too. This isn't copy pasta map making like JC2, they're probably focusing on one city alone. I'd love a JC2 size map personally, if it felt uniquely detailed all around. JC2 was fun as hell to travel around, awesome map.
Users WebsitePM
  Top
 

 
LaBrat  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 05:53
Quote Post


Snitch
Group Icon
Group: BUSTED!
Joined: Jan 9, 2012

XXXXX



QUOTE (Sirwest299 @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 04:38)
If it was only Los Santos, he would have just gone straight to the point and said "Yes it will be only Los Santos"

And why is that? Just because you say so?
PM
  Top
 

 
thatguy23  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 06:05
Quote Post


Homie
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Jun 17, 2011

au.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (Sirwest299 @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 04:38)
If it was only Los Santos, he would have just gone straight to the point and said "Yes it will be only Los Santos" but he didn't. This doesn't prove anything.

So you think its a good marketing plan to just go out an say "it's ONLY LS and the surrounding beach's and countryside." The reason they didn't say "only" is because it sounds too restrictive if you asked me.
PMPlayStation Network
  Top
 

 
Jeeebuuus  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 06:11
Quote Post


AKA So-crates
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Nov 3, 2011

mars.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (thatguy23 @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 06:05)
QUOTE (Sirwest299 @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 04:38)
If it was only Los Santos, he would have just gone straight to the point and said "Yes it will be only Los Santos" but he didn't. This doesn't prove anything.

So you think its a good marketing plan to just go out an say "it's ONLY LS and the surrounding beach's and countryside." The reason they didn't say "only" is because it sounds too restrictive if you asked me.

For anyone. Why would it bother you if they said it is "only" LS? If it is "not SF or LV"? Why? There is no logical reason.
PM
  Top
 

 
AuSsIeThUnDeR36  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 06:14
Quote Post


Marching on Together
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Jan 29, 2012

au.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (Fuzz_ball @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 03:36)
Also look at the two parts they said. LA and surrounding country side and re-imaged of So-cal. Back in SA trailers, was just Los santos, then LV and SF came in to play. Who knows, maybe just LS in the first trailer but maybe another big city in So-Cal will be in it too, Like Bakersfield nd SD. Plus in GTA: IV, we all thought it'll be just LC, but we had a small Albery (NJ) in the play. Hopefully we can get a good idea on map size in a few months. o3o

Planes. We must be able to fly to another airport. Why would they just have 'ONE' airport at Los Santos International?
In the original SA, we played the Los Santos missions before being taken and dumped off in Angel Pine. But back then we had the whole map to look at.
Maybe in GTA V we will see JUST the Los Santos map, then at some stage after finishing the LS missions, we get kidnapped or told 'Get your ass to SF' then SF opens up and you check the map and see that it has been added and the map size zoomed back more to show it.
Whatever happens this game will be huge.
PM
  Top
 

 
Sirwest299  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 06:44
Quote Post


Player Hater
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: May 21, 2010

XXXXX



QUOTE (LaBrat @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 05:53)
QUOTE (Sirwest299 @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 04:38)
If it was only Los Santos, he would have just gone straight to the point and said "Yes it will be only Los Santos"

And why is that? Just because you say so?

Your reply didn't even make sense to my comment. What do you mean "Because you say so"? I'm about 80% sf and lv are not in the game and I was saying that if it was definite that there was no sf or lv he would have said it straight so there's no need to act like a pathetic smart ass.
PM
  Top
 

 
Sirwest299  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 06:53
Quote Post


Player Hater
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: May 21, 2010

XXXXX



QUOTE (thatguy23 @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 06:05)
QUOTE (Sirwest299 @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 04:38)
If it was only Los Santos, he would have just gone straight to the point and said "Yes it will be only Los Santos" but he didn't. This doesn't prove anything.

So you think its a good marketing plan to just go out an say "it's ONLY LS and the surrounding beach's and countryside." The reason they didn't say "only" is because it sounds too restrictive if you asked me.

I was suggesting anything he could have said. He could have said "LV and SF will not be featured in the game." I didn't mean for him to say exactly what I wrote but rather make it obvious that SF and LV won't be in the game to stop low lives on this forum from arguing at each other. Gosh I never knew this place was full of butt hurt GTA fans who get offended when someone posts something. I guess it was my mistake for replying.
PM
  Top
 

 
RiccardoPatrese  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 09:08
Quote Post


Punk-ass Bitch
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Jul 26, 2006

nl.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (gtasadude @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 05:29)
Didn't you guys watch the trailer? The shot with the digger on the right and the city in the distance, that's probably less than half the size of the city alone and it was massive. The countryside looks huge too. This isn't copy pasta map making like JC2, they're probably focusing on one city alone. I'd love a JC2 size map personally, if it felt uniquely detailed all around. JC2 was fun as hell to travel around, awesome map.

Yes, I did watch the trailer and studied the 'Mapping LS-thread'. Based on that my conclusion is that LS isn't massive at all, my guess it's about halve the size of Liberty City in IV which leaves plenty of room for other cities.
PMPlayStation Network
  Top
 

 
kesta195  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 09:12
Quote Post


L.S.P.D.
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Jun 20, 2011

uk.gif

XXXXX



Well I dont believe that SF and LV will be in the game but they still havent disconfirmed it, they just said the same thing they said in the press release. The only way they can confirm this is to say 'Yes that's correct, SF and LV will not be in the game' or something along those lines. If they came out and announced that they were in the game, they wont have lied, they'll have just been misleading.
PMPlayStation Network
  Top
 

 
Mats17  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 09:19
Quote Post


Rat
Group Icon
Group: BUSTED!
Joined: Jan 11, 2012

XXXXX



QUOTE (kesta195 @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 09:12)
Well I dont believe that SF and LV will be in the game but they still havent disconfirmed it, they just said the same thing they said in the press release. The only way they can confirm this is to say 'Yes that's correct, SF and LV will not be in the game' or something along those lines. If they came out and announced that they were in the game, they wont have lied, they'll have just been misleading.

That question was mine and I got a weird answer back
PM
  Top
 

 
Trideez  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 09:28
Quote Post


7-8 Lions LG
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Nov 25, 2001

us.gif

XXXXX



There's no such thing as SF or LV in this Universe or Era or World, duh!
PM
  Top
 

 
paddyboy  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 09:48
Quote Post


Punk-ass Bitch
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Jul 3, 2007

il.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (SGT. Johnson @ Monday, Feb 13 2012, 22:01)
What amazes me is that they say it will be "their biggest map ever", but we only have Los Santos and thecountryside. The countryside must be ginormous then!

Well, real life LA is massive; it’s far bigger than New York, geographically speaking. So it stands to reason that Rockstar’s biggest world ever would contain their largest city ever. Add in a healthy does of countryside and you have a very, very large map.
PM
  Top
 

 
Meyus  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 10:21
Quote Post


I need a f**king midwife for this thing!
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Dec 3, 2011

tk.gif

XXXXX



I think GTA V set in two cities like GTA IV. GTA IV was set in two cities: Liberty City (New York) and Alderney (New Jersey). And GTA V, Los Santos (Los Angeles) and Los Puerta (San Diego - I guess Los Puerta is San Diego). I hope we'll see more cities.. cool.gif
Users WebsitePMPlayStation Network
  Top
 

 
Dick Valor  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 10:33
Quote Post


Cold Ass Honky
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Nov 30, 2011

us.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (RiccardoPatrese @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 09:08)
QUOTE (gtasadude @ Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 05:29)
Didn't you guys watch the trailer? The shot with the digger on the right and the city in the distance, that's probably less than half the size of the city alone and it was massive. The countryside looks huge too. This isn't copy pasta map making like JC2, they're probably focusing on one city alone. I'd love a JC2 size map personally, if it felt uniquely detailed all around. JC2 was fun as hell to travel around, awesome map.

Yes, I did watch the trailer and studied the 'Mapping LS-thread'. Based on that my conclusion is that LS isn't massive at all, my guess it's about halve the size of Liberty City in IV which leaves plenty of room for other cities.

They didn't even show the whole city in the trailer. It's way too early to determine how small or large LS really is. Landmarks are always closer together in GTA, but L.A. is ginormous and we don't know all the areas R* will feature. There may be something on the other side of those mountains or there may be more to the south than we realize. And there's a ginormous 9 hole (presumably) golf course somewhere in there. I suspect it will be closer to LC's size than you think.
PMPlayStation Network
  Top
 

 
Miamivicecity  
Posted: Tuesday, Feb 14 2012, 10:40
Quote Post


The young and stupid get tricked by the old and bitter...
Group Icon
Group: Zaibatsu
Joined: Oct 14, 2007

au.gif

Member Award




Keep in mind also the true size of LC was never shown in any of GTA IV's trailers.
Users WebsitePMXbox LivePlayStation Network
  Top
 

 

0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

0 Members:

Pages: (8) « First ... 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... Last »

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll
Search topic for posted by (exact match)



 
IMG IMG