[shrode]

i got 1 million dollar in-game money and i cant decide which one should i buy

[Arsen Vitiuk]

M16 hands down! This gun will tear ANYTHING and ANYONE apart in a mere second!

[Th3MaN1]

The M-16 has a big rate of fire,better range,and a bigger magazine.Through the M 16 is a better choice,I like the AK-47 a lot more.It's more fun with it.I only use the M-16 in missions where you have to blow up cars,since aiming with the RPG or grenade throwing is a bitch.

[lol232]

QUOTE (Arsen Vitiuk @ Thursday, Jan 5 2012, 11:17)

M16 hands down! This gun will tear ANYTHING and ANYONE apart in a mere second!

What about Chuck Norris, T-850, Rhino, and any Bulletproof Car ?

You can buy a bunch of everything. 1 Million is a LOT LOT MORE than enough.
You can buy, let's say even 50 Of Each Weapon. You can also collect packages for free weapons and body armour!
In real Life, I'd take Kalashnikov (AK-47), but in GTA III I'd take M-16, it will kill ANYBODY (Besides Chuck Norris and T-850) withing a single bullet, and destroy any vehicle (besides a Bulletproof vehicle and Rhino).

[fireguy109]

AK-47 is a lot easier to aim with and conserve ammo with in a firefight. Even though the M16 kills with one shot you still end up wasting ammo.

[_____]

The M-16 has more recoil but it causes more damage, so overall it is the better choice. But you can own both weapons at the same time.

[Th3MaN1]

QUOTE (_____ @ Friday, Jan 6 2012, 13:57)

The M-16 has more recoil but it causes more damage, so overall it is the better choice. But you can own both weapons at the same time.

The recoil is only noticeable when aiming in 1st Person.Other than that,in the PC version,it will always shoot where you point.But,you'll end up wasting ammo because of the very big rate of fire.My choice is the AK-47.

[TrialzGTAS]

AK for easy skirmishes, but m16 for f*cking sh*t UP!

[pomor]

In GTA III M16 is more like minigun

[Arsen Vitiuk]

QUOTE (fireguy109 @ Friday, Jan 6 2012, 02:10)

Even though the M16 kills with one shot you still end up wasting ammo.

If you are skilled enough, you will be able to shoot without wasting a single spare bullet.

[fireguy109]

Yeah but then he has to bring up the gun after each time you line up a shot in order to pull the trigger., which takes time - especially when you have a horde of Cartel attacking you.

[Arsen Vitiuk]

Accuracy or efficiency was always the matter for this weapon: you can have them both, but never at the same time.

[oglevempire]

I guess that people don't really understand we're speaking about the Chuck Norris M16 version like in GTA3. In GTA3, the M16 has a f*cking unbelievable damage rage, you can spray anything to death. Very powerful and fast. On the other hand, the AK47, is quite slow and his damage rate is much lesser than the M16's. It seems that Rockstar games don't see the difference between AK and MP5.

[Arsen Vitiuk]

The thing is, AK47 in GTA III is close to what we would see in real life. But yes, the M16 in the real world is much less powerful than that.

Perhaps Rockstar thought that with the development of new GTA games, each one getting closer and closer to reality, it will be harder for them to maintain the image of the Minigun-like M16 - probably the reason they introduced the Vulcan Gattling Gun in Vice City.

[cyberwolf00233]

M-16 is beast, buy loads of ammo for it and go tear up the leones, payback for their shotguns

[LaikaBoss]

M16 is by far the better choice if you're good with manual aiming.

[Timcatgt5]

I'd stick to accuracy rather than fire-power, The AK is useful at the 2nd island, with the lock-on mode and fire away at your enemies, the M16 has a manual aim but the devastating fire-power can take down your foes within a microsecond, if you were in a situation between the FBI and the Army, I'd go for the AK.

[DanDigiMan]

The M16 spits bullets out way too fast for me. It's more powerful than the AK, but I use the AK more often than the M16