IMG

 
IMG
IMG   IMG
  Welcome to GTAForums! Be sure to check out the Grand Theft Auto V Forum.

You are not registered! (If you are, click here to login) Registering is fast, free and easy and allows you to instantly reply to any topic on GTAForums.
Why wait? Click here to register your own unique username and become part of the ever-growing community!


( Log In | Register | Revalidate Validation E-mail )
Quick Log-In:
  IMG
       
>
Pages: (3) 1 2 [3]   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 2014 corvette

 
Senex Iunior  
Posted: Friday, Dec 9 2011, 03:24
Quote Post


Living in Vice Point since 2002
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Apr 14, 2011

jolly-roger.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (visionist @ Thursday, Dec 8 2011, 16:10)
If it puts Americans off Slushboxes, then I'm all for Ballsack shifters.

I think we'd be less averse to manuals if we drove on the left side of the road and weren't so damn lazy.

Still, clutchless manuals ftw. All the control without the responsibility.
PM
  Top
 

 
Tuff Luv Capo  
Posted: Friday, Dec 9 2011, 03:58
Quote Post


We must find Ansama Benlanden
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Oct 15, 2002

jolly-roger.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (Senex Iunior @ Thursday, Dec 8 2011, 22:24)
QUOTE (visionist @ Thursday, Dec 8 2011, 16:10)
If it puts Americans off Slushboxes, then I'm all for Ballsack shifters.

I think we'd be less averse to manuals if we drove on the left side of the road and weren't so damn lazy.

Still, clutchless manuals ftw. All the control without the responsibility.

Whenever I hear clutchless manual, I think of the people with paddle shifters that slowly command it to the next gear with a noisy thunk after its bounced off of the rev limiter for a few seconds. I've yet to drive a car that changed my mind about that.
PMMSNAOLXbox Live
  Top
 

 
Lurch  
Posted: Friday, Dec 9 2011, 04:09
Quote Post


I'm f*cking in. You're f*cking out.
Group Icon
Group: The Connection
Joined: Feb 23, 2009

jolly-roger.gif

Member Award




QUOTE (Senex Iunior @ Thursday, Dec 8 2011, 23:24)
QUOTE (visionist @ Thursday, Dec 8 2011, 16:10)
If it puts Americans off Slushboxes, then I'm all for Ballsack shifters.

I think we'd be less averse to manuals if we drove on the left side of the road and weren't so damn lazy.

Not really sure how the side of the road we're driving on dictates americans not driving manuals as much. Since the majority of people in the world are right handed, I don't see how having a shifter on our left side is going to make us want to drive a manual more. I have no desire to drive a RHD car unless it has an external-mounted shifter like this.

user posted image
user posted image

My right hand is like the greatest thing ever.
PMMSNAOLYahooPlayStation Network
  Top
 

 
Senex Iunior  
Posted: Friday, Dec 9 2011, 04:59
Quote Post


Living in Vice Point since 2002
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Apr 14, 2011

jolly-roger.gif

XXXXX



For most people, it's easier to control the steering wheel with your right hand. I think that had we stayed RHD, more people would use manuals; manuals are just an "inconvenience" to new LHD drivers.

As for clutchless manuals, I'm referring more to Sequentronic-like gearshift systems. Not a fan of paddle shifters either.

This post has been edited by Senex Iunior on Friday, Dec 9 2011, 06:50
PM
  Top
 

 
leik oh em jeez!  
Posted: Friday, Dec 9 2011, 05:49
Quote Post


The boatman stays with the boat.
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Mar 28, 2007

us.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (Senex Iunior @ Thursday, Dec 8 2011, 23:59)
For most people, it's easier to control the steering wheel with your right hand. I think that had we stayed RHD, more people would use manuals; manuals just an "inconvenience" to new LHD drivers.

Spinning a wheel is pretty straight forward. But with how f*cking retarded my left arm is, I couldn't imagine trying to shift gears with it. I can steer fine with either hand, but there are some things my left arm/hand can't do. That includes throwing anything, writing, or shifting gears. Only manual I've driven is my father's 01 Silverado 2500HD and that was fairly fun.
Users WebsitePM
  Top
 

 
sivispacem  
Posted: Friday, Dec 9 2011, 11:23
Quote Post


Wilderness of Mirrors
Group Icon
Group: The Connection
Joined: Feb 14, 2011

en.gif

Member Award




QUOTE (Tuff Luv Capo @ Friday, Dec 9 2011, 04:58)
Whenever I hear clutchless manual, I think of the people with paddle shifters that slowly command it to the next gear with a noisy thunk after its bounced off of the rev limiter for a few seconds. I've yet to drive a car that changed my mind about that.

You mean the sluggish, jerky automated manual transmissions? They're universally awful, agreed, but there are good clutchless, non-automatic transmissions out there. Mostly used in the racing world, mind you. Tend to use dog clutches instead of slipper ones, which means, whilst technically they do have a clutch, it's not operated by the driver in the same way a conventional one is. Besides, isn't an automatic transfer box basically a fluid clutch anyway? The idea of "clutchless" doesn't really make sense to me.
PM
  Top
 

 
Lurch  
Posted: Friday, Dec 9 2011, 20:00
Quote Post


I'm f*cking in. You're f*cking out.
Group Icon
Group: The Connection
Joined: Feb 23, 2009

jolly-roger.gif

Member Award




QUOTE (leik oh em jeez! @ Friday, Dec 9 2011, 01:49)
QUOTE (Senex Iunior @ Thursday, Dec 8 2011, 23:59)
For most people, it's easier to control the steering wheel with your right hand. I think that had we stayed RHD, more people would use manuals; manuals just an "inconvenience" to new LHD drivers.

Spinning a wheel is pretty straight forward. But with how f*cking retarded my left arm is, I couldn't imagine trying to shift gears with it. I can steer fine with either hand, but there are some things my left arm/hand can't do. That includes throwing anything, writing, or shifting gears. Only manual I've driven is my father's 01 Silverado 2500HD and that was fairly fun.

Yeah, a wheel only goes two ways. Shifting can be a bit more complicated, especially on high gear trans in trucks where you're constantly range shifting or splitting or shifting 2 speed rear ends.




This post has been edited by Lurch on Friday, Dec 9 2011, 20:11
PMMSNAOLYahooPlayStation Network
  Top
 

 
visionist  
Posted: Friday, Dec 9 2011, 22:33
Quote Post


Eat A Peach For Hours
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Dec 6, 2007

it.gif

XXXXX



The problem with Sequentials is exactly that; you're stuck shifting back & forth through a fixed order of gears, as opposed to a MK1 Manual which lets you engage any ratio as you see fit. The solution lies in the past; Porsche (Sportomatic), Volkswagen (Autostick), Saab (Sensonic) and even Ferrari (Valeo) used to offer boxes with a traditional stick in a standard gate, but without a clutch pedal. The systems were highly advanced for the time, incorporating such features as an "Intent To Shift" sensor actuated by grasping the gearlever, which primed the single clutch to swap whichever cog was selected, at a faster or gentler pace based upon many factors: current road speed, throttle position, engine RPM, transmission input & output speeds, release bearing position & shifter position (In & In-between gears). The systems could Idle in-gear and actually learnt the driver's style, adapting readily to it. They even incorporated launch control: step on the gas with the stick in neutral and then slam it into first, leaving a nice sticky black tyre deposit just like a normal burnout. Ferrari even built a single F40 with the Valeo system, allegedly now residing in The Sultan Of Brunei's 6000+ Strong Automotive Stable.

Unfortunately, they didn't catch on: too expensive & unreliable using then contemporary technology. A modern system offering a 6 or even 7 speed gate and Duppelkupplunsgetriebe would give you full manual control whilst saving your clutch leg in traffic. Alas...
PMXbox LivePlayStation Network
  Top
 

 
sivispacem  
Posted: Friday, Dec 9 2011, 23:36
Quote Post


Wilderness of Mirrors
Group Icon
Group: The Connection
Joined: Feb 14, 2011

en.gif

Member Award




QUOTE (visionist @ Friday, Dec 9 2011, 23:33)
Unfortunately, they didn't catch on: too expensive & unreliable using then contemporary technology. A modern system offering a 6 or even 7 speed gate and Duppelkupplunsgetriebe would give you full manual control whilst saving your clutch leg in traffic. Alas...

Wouldn't that basically just be a slightly less refined double-clutch gearbox?
PM
  Top
 

 
visionist  
Posted: Friday, Dec 9 2011, 23:47
Quote Post


Eat A Peach For Hours
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Dec 6, 2007

it.gif

XXXXX



...slower shifts perhaps, yes, but only marginally so. The time it takes you to move the lever is the time the system takes to change gear. On The Green Hell, it might cost you 10 seconds a lap, but on The Greenbelt Hell (M25 tounge.gif), it'l save you a Hell of a load of Cursing.

This post has been edited by visionist on Monday, Dec 19 2011, 20:48
PMXbox LivePlayStation Network
  Top
 

 
Lurch  
Posted: Saturday, Dec 10 2011, 01:07
Quote Post


I'm f*cking in. You're f*cking out.
Group Icon
Group: The Connection
Joined: Feb 23, 2009

jolly-roger.gif

Member Award




VW's autostick incorporated a torque converter right? That big heavy spinning mass of ATF is not something I want. f*ck fluid drive.
PMMSNAOLYahooPlayStation Network
  Top
 

 
visionist  
Posted: Saturday, Dec 10 2011, 14:25
Quote Post


Eat A Peach For Hours
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Dec 6, 2007

it.gif

XXXXX



Autostick used a fluid coupling yes. It was a 60s thing cool.gif

Valeo used a conventional single plate biter.
PMXbox LivePlayStation Network
  Top
 

 

0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

0 Members:

Pages: (3) 1 2 [3] 

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll
Search topic for posted by (exact match)



 
IMG IMG