fugly cars
 |
|
 |
| |
sivispacem  |
Posted: Wednesday, Aug 8 2012, 14:15
|
Wilderness of Mirrors

Group: The Connection
Joined: Feb 14, 2011



|
| QUOTE (Sup3rman @ Wednesday, Aug 8 2012, 12:15) | | QUOTE (Ronnyboy @ Wednesday, Aug 8 2012, 05:40) | |
Sry but LOLWUT ??? If thats ugly then i'm a princess. | It looks like a Spaniel taking a sh*t. Who would you like to be, Ariel, Aurora, Belle, Cinderella or Jasmine?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
Sup3rman  |
Posted: Wednesday, Aug 8 2012, 14:33
|
Homeboy

Group: Members
Joined: Apr 7, 2012

|
| QUOTE (sivispacem @ Wednesday, Aug 8 2012, 14:15) | | QUOTE (Sup3rman @ Wednesday, Aug 8 2012, 12:15) | | QUOTE (Ronnyboy @ Wednesday, Aug 8 2012, 05:40) | |
Sry but LOLWUT ??? If thats ugly then i'm a princess. |
It looks like a Spaniel taking a sh*t. Who would you like to be, Ariel, Aurora, Belle, Cinderella or Jasmine? | Sry but i almost never take your opinion for granted because you like cars that others don't and think most beautifully designed cars are crap. This car is not ugly, the shape of it and the profile is just excellent.  The lines on the side make it look powerful and sleek.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
sivispacem  |
Posted: Wednesday, Aug 8 2012, 15:17
|
Wilderness of Mirrors

Group: The Connection
Joined: Feb 14, 2011



|
The short rear overhang and the sloping roof look like a dog crouches on it's hind legs, which is an image amplified by the fact the rear wheel arch looks like a hip. It's a dog squatting, plain and simple. Now, you might like a car that looks like a dog taking a dump- quite literally- but I can't say I do.
Quite aside from that:
1) A well-styled car does not need an entirely pointless angular crease line down the doors.
2) The ratio of glass to bodywork above the rearmost window is all kinds of wrong. I know they've done it to keep a smooth, flowing curve to the rear window, but to me that just looks like the side profile and roof were designed by different people, in different offices, who never actually communicated their design to each other.
3) That rear arch. For the love of god, why? I agree that flared wheel arches can go a long way to making a car look muscular. That's what sets the E46 M3 apart from the lesser models, as do the arches on the likes of the RS4. But what on earth were Mercedes thinking when they decided that the profile of the front and rear arches would be so markedly different? It looks almost as if it was designed like a half-track tank before someone had the bright idea of fitting wheels to the rear.
4) The mirrors are huge, ungainly and look like an afterthought.
5) It has a shark-fin antennae. If it wasn't bad enough that they'd decided to copy parts of designs from other marques, it's positioning looks like an afterthought. It should be to the near-extreme-rear of the car- it looks like they forgot to move it when they converted it from saloon/hatch hybrid to estate.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Pages:
(39) « First ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... Last »
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
| |
 |
|
 |
|