Close Topic Options

[bobgtafan]

First off why the hell couldn't they give us all a bone and say it's going to be in x------------ place? Now we have all of these people running around here making us all look like retards over one like corner picture. "OMGXZ! I THNK I saw A Head! I swear...

[Jerm11b]

looks to me kind of like a Point Of View picture from a guy in a suit laying on his back on a beach with his left leg up in a ^ shape?

[Tommy_Montana_2009]

Hi,again.I have pictures of the page with the (NeXt gta)
Here
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_L6E4hOYhics/Suir.../gta-v-clue.jpg
And a zoom:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_L6E4hOYhics/Suir...C3%ADtulo-1.jpg
If you see,he says:´
´´Open marh everywhere```
In march have the next GTA!!!!!!
Thanks for:
my favourite GTA Blog,GTA BR Team,and GTA Place,to post the pics!

[gangster_b]

Well, i would say it looks like a mountain, some snow and trees...
Maybe Aspen, Or Alaska

[Garfield 2]

QUOTE (Tommy_Montana_2009 @ Oct 29 2009, 00:29)

Hi,again.I have pictures of the page with the (NeXt gta) Here http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_L6E4hOYhics/Suir.../gta-v-clue.jpg And a zoom: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_L6E4hOYhics/Suir...C3%ADtulo-1.jpg If you see,he says:´ ´´Open marh everywhere``` In march have the next GTA!!!!!! Thanks for: my favourite GTA Blog,GTA BR Team,and GTA Place,to post the pics!

That has been mentioned already.

[agincourtsalute]

It has "OFFICIAL ENTRANT LC FILM FESTIVAL" written in the top right corner.

Its just a fake ad for a fake film in LC.

Its no R* hint at the new GTA location.

[Gege]

QUOTE (Garfield 2 @ Oct 28 2009, 23:52)

QUOTE (fratelli @ Oct 28 2009, 23:48) QUOTE (fratelli @ Oct 28 2009, 20:49) Holy sh*t guys dogs in GTA V?! picture omg how do u find this stuff ur so smart EFLC - 29.99EUR Xbox 360 - 200EUR Leaflet - Worth around 50 cents Watching someone quote himself - PRICELESS

Massive Pwnage!

[Spaghetti Cat]

ScratchCard, changed my vote, this is the most detailed thread

Heck thread of the year material. Someone call in the CSI guys!

Anyways, these are my thoughts:

First, the picture is clearly of a mountain. Since it was in a previous game, Mt Chillad would be a perfect fit. One of the biggest complaints about IV, and Liberty City specifically, was the lack of countryside. R* would be wise to include a country side in whatever form neXt takes. All of this indicates neXt is San Andreas, or at least somewhere out west.

The next clues come from this ad in the manual:



New York (Liberty City) is the entertainment capital of the US...along with...you guessed it Los Angles (Los Santos). Liberty City has the Theatre (Broadway) and Los Santos has the film industry. As pointed out Seagull was a theatre in Liberty City. Then why is a theatre production entered into a Film Festival??

The Box art from IV is included in the add. The mountain picture looks suspiciously like a new piece of box art.

Liberty City, It's Over! Could be a hint that R* is moving on from LC. Which is bad news for PS3 owners, like me, who were hoping for some DLC of their own. Though it could be the awaited San Andreas Stories, but that wouldn't be considered a true neXt in my book.

Those are my opinions, guess we'll all find out in March. Hopefully March of 2010.




I see him, there in the bushes! The Rat/Bat/Sasquatch-man!

[CubA_iLL_BrothA]

maybe just a design for Halloween, since it's close
or gang/mob symbol

or just some bull sh*t

[SpecialAnimal]

QUOTE (Spaghetti Cat @ Oct 29 2009, 00:56)

PICTURE ScratchCard, changed my vote, this is the most detailed thread Heck thread of the year material. Someone call in the CSI guys! Anyways, these are my thoughts: First, the picture is clearly of a mountain. Since it was in a previous game, Mt Chillad would be a perfect fit. One of the biggest complaints about IV, and Liberty City specifically, was the lack of countryside. R* would be wise to include a country side in whatever form neXt takes. All of this indicates neXt is San Andreas, or at least somewhere out west. The next clues come from this ad in the manual: PICTURE New York (Liberty City) is the entertainment capital of the US...along with...you guessed it Los Angles (Los Santos). Liberty City has the Theatre (Broadway) and Los Santos has the film industry. As pointed out Seagull was a theatre in Liberty City. Then why is a theatre production entered into a Film Festival?? The Box art from IV is included in the add. The mountain picture looks suspiciously like a new piece of box art. Liberty City, It's Over! Could be a hint that R* is moving on from LC. Which is bad news for PS3 owners, like me, who were hoping for some DLC of their own. Though it could be the awaited San Andreas Stories, but that wouldn't be considered a true neXt in my book. Those are my opinions, guess we'll all find out in March. Hopefully March of 2010. I see him, there in the bushes! The Rat/Bat/Sasquatch-man!

This seems the most plausible.

[jnzooger]

OMG...

The GTA:neXt will be on the next game console. Guaranteed.

The next GTA would have to be a IV game if it were to include Packie. The DLC is finished however.

I see the IV canon like the GTA1 canon. Only having Episodic content before they move on to the next. GTA2 had only one city and it wasn't LC (as far as we know), thus I see GTA:neXt as a one off in a city that isn't already used. From that picture, I would guess maybe Denver.

If for some reason there is another IV canon game, and it stared Packie, it would have to be the UK.

[Tsar_Smirnoff]

I've looked at that picture now for a couple of minutes and frankly it doesn't look like anything to me. Sure you could say it's a mountain, but that's stretching it......it's just too distorted. Ever since the IV era, the box art on the games has moved away from that simple, shader style artwork like in III and Vice City and has become very detailed; if you know what I mean. I agree that it's just a page or poster behind the one torn.

Though I do agree that we will most likely travel to San Andreas(or maybe just one of the cities) for the next game. I mean they've been to Liberty City three times, Vice City twice, but only once to San Andreas......I think a return is long overdue.

[XZGamer71]

Hmmmm... I think in the bit where it's ripped should be the city name, but it's clearly been ripped out, so maybe in its place they put a little picture that hints the next GTA.

[freedom]

What does it say above Seagull? Can anyone make it out?

QUOTE

It has "OFFICIAL ENTRANT LC FILM FESTIVAL" written in the top right corner. Its just a fake ad for a fake film in LC. Its no R* hint at the new GTA location.

It's a fake ad, but it's obviously a hint at something to come. The fact that it's such a small almost abstract clip of an image proves that it's a hint.

[Magic_Al]

Apparently Seagull is a movie theater and not a live theatre?

The only clue in this fake movie ad that I take seriously is March.

As for revisiting Vice City or San Andreas, I always remember the "soul destroying" quote from Rockstar's head artist. Source

QUOTE (Aaron Garbut)

In GTA III, Liberty City was very much its own place. It obviously had elements of New York along with other cities but there were no landmarks and nothing deliberately recognizable. In Vice City, and then more so in San Andreas, we started to take real landmarks and mix them in to our versions of the city. I think this is just us continuing down that path we had already started on. It's one of the reasons we felt comfortable redoing Liberty City. We spend years of our lives making these worlds we don't want to retread old ground and "up-res" something we had already done, that would be soul destroying. By going back to basics, throwing away the original Liberty City and building an entirely new city based on New York we were able to keep it fresh for ourselves and by extension for the people that will play it.

The bolded portion tells me a new Vice City or a new San Andreas is never happening, not unless they can do something that's not just building the same landmarks again at higher resolution. The design of Vice City and certainly San Andreas is already at the quality of GTA IV in every way but detail, so why would Rockstar be interested in going back?

[Germanviking86]

It looks like London.

This will be good, for both city, and country folk.

The way the roundabout is set up around London is like this, You can not see London. And when your entering London around Gatwick, you can only see it clearly on the way to the Airport.

Something tells me that the next GTA will be set in London, with some small villages on the northern outskirts, surrounded by plain after plain.

But considerring that I've been to London, I expect to see some American imports where they drive on the left side of the car.

[XZGamer71]

QUOTE (Magic_Al @ Oct 29 2009, 01:23)

Apparently Seagull is a movie theater and not a live theatre? The only clue in this fake movie ad that I take seriously is March. As for revisiting Vice City or San Andreas, I always remember the "soul destroying" quote from Rockstar's head artist. Source QUOTE (Aaron Garbut) In GTA III, Liberty City was very much its own place. It obviously had elements of New York along with other cities but there were no landmarks and nothing deliberately recognizable. In Vice City, and then more so in San Andreas, we started to take real landmarks and mix them in to our versions of the city. I think this is just us continuing down that path we had already started on. It's one of the reasons we felt comfortable redoing Liberty City. We spend years of our lives making these worlds we don't want to retread old ground and "up-res" something we had already done, that would be soul destroying. By going back to basics, throwing away the original Liberty City and building an entirely new city based on New York we were able to keep it fresh for ourselves and by extension for the people that will play it. The bolded portion tells me a new Vice City or a new San Andreas is never happening, not unless they can do something that's not just building the same landmarks again at higher resolution. The design of Vice City and certainly San Andreas is already at the quality of GTA IV in every way but detail, so why would Rockstar be interested in going back?

Damn, i just died a lil' inside

EDIT: MY 600th Post Yay

This post has been edited by XZGamer71 on Oct 29 2009, 01:35

[ioN]

QUOTE (Magic_Al @ Oct 28 2009, 20:23)

Apparently Seagull is a movie theater and not a live theatre? The only clue in this fake movie ad that I take seriously is March. As for revisiting Vice City or San Andreas, I always remember the "soul destroying" quote from Rockstar's head artist. Source QUOTE (Aaron Garbut) In GTA III, Liberty City was very much its own place. It obviously had elements of New York along with other cities but there were no landmarks and nothing deliberately recognizable. In Vice City, and then more so in San Andreas, we started to take real landmarks and mix them in to our versions of the city. I think this is just us continuing down that path we had already started on. It's one of the reasons we felt comfortable redoing Liberty City. We spend years of our lives making these worlds we don't want to retread old ground and "up-res" something we had already done, that would be soul destroying. By going back to basics, throwing away the original Liberty City and building an entirely new city based on New York we were able to keep it fresh for ourselves and by extension for the people that will play it. The bolded portion tells me a new Vice City or a new San Andreas is never happening, not unless they can do something that's not just building the same landmarks again at higher resolution. The design of Vice City and certainly San Andreas is already at the quality of GTA IV in every way but detail, so why would Rockstar be interested in going back?

They revisited LC 4 times. The 3rd and 4th time it was redone. So SA or VC will be redone to.

[CubA_iLL_BrothA]

they'll probably just make VC over then SA, like they did before

SA they should make over now

[freedom]

QUOTE (Germanviking86 @ Oct 29 2009, 01:27)

It looks like London. This will be good, for both city, and country folk. The way the roundabout is set up around London is like this, You can not see London. And when your entering London around Gatwick, you can only see it clearly on the way to the Airport. Something tells me that the next GTA will be set in London, with some small villages on the northern outskirts, surrounded by plain after plain. But considerring that I've been to London, I expect to see some American imports where they drive on the left side of the car.

QUOTE

It looks like London. This will be good, for both city, and country folk. The way the roundabout is set up around London is like this, You can not see London.  And when your entering London around Gatwick, you can only see it clearly on the way to the Airport. Something tells me that the next GTA will be set in London, with some small villages on the northern outskirts, surrounded by plain after plain. But considerring that I've been to London, I expect to see some American imports where they drive on the left side of the car.

How does it look like London? I really don't know why you think the next GTA will be in London. It would surely be cool, but I think they will probably stick with the fictional USA cities for now. I would get your hopes up.