IMG

 
IMG
IMG   IMG
  Welcome to GTAForums! Be sure to check out the GTA IV Forum.

You are not registered! (If you are, click here to login) Registering is fast, free and easy and allows you to instantly reply to any topic on GTAForums.
Why wait? Click here to register your own unique username and become part of the ever-growing community!


( Log In | Register | Revalidate Validation E-mail )
Quick Log-In:
  IMG
       
>

Pages: (3) [1] 2 3   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> ATI Problems - an analysis
 
XLM1  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 12:01
Quote Post


PC gamer union
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: May 3, 2008

gr.gif

XXXXX



Hello all,

i was abstinent some time, but having now GTA IV, it makes me come back. I have also an ATI (4850), though experiencing most of the problems stated here. I have the luck wo work for an IT-Company which distributes also hardware. Given this, i had the opportunity to mess around with diffrend hardware and software configurations.

My conclusion is: GTA IV is havily optimized for NVIDIA putting ATI into the posion to "just being able to play it".

So, what iīve basically done is, to test GTAIV on various rigs. Also, most of my friends also having GTA IV, also have ATI-Cards, so we met today in the company to mess around in the lab. I donīt have the time, to write down all the (five) configurations we tested, but only the conclusions:

1. All ATI-Cards have problems. Some differ from others but all share one prob: poor performance in terms of fps.

2. They performed really bad, indepentend of CPU and RAM and OS (XP SP3 / Vista SP1).

Having this said, it leads me to conclude, that R*-Bitches optimized it so havy for nvidia, that there are consequently Problems with ATI-Cards.


In the past there were also situations with games, which were optimized for ATI cards thus leading NVIDIA user to have problems. This is an fact, which results in optimizations for a specific kind of architectures.

In my case we used an 2900XT, 3850XT (Overclocked), a standard 4850 and a factory overclocked 4870 from Sapphire. We tried diffrent drivers from ATI and other ones (Catalyst etc.). Still having the same problems.


Like some guys already said on this forums: ati put things straight in terms of "fixes" some times, but as you know from some games, those fixes only prevented crashing etc. So there are always limits within a fix can do things. I guess, that in GTAIV those limits are very low, so that a fix wonīt do things better concerning fps correlated with texture quality.

Also, i feel somehow acknowledged by the fact, that the pre-release version sent to some Magazines (european and us ones), didnīt even "support" ATI cards thus the game was crashing. Here is a link to a german mag, which tested the performance of GTA IV on a broad range of Systems with the pre-release Candidate (November): Keep an eye on the box on the lower right, displaying the unablity to play on any ATI-Cards Click Me They also state, that there were problems with some Geforce 7-Series, but the source of the problems was driver-side. Also there is a Quad-Core CPU needed to run the game while it does crash with "simple" P4s. The overall Quality adjustments you can make in GTA4 depend only from the memory of the GPU.

I have the feeling and to some extend also an acknowledgement, that (a) GTA IV is a bad port like it precedors and (b) this time NVIDIA did suck some cocks @ R*.


As some of you may know, i am a consequent person. I said to myself in the past, that i wonīt buy a console if GTA IV isnīt shipping for PC. In this case i brought it back to my vendor, because i wonīt buy myself a NVDIA, just because some assholes are horny on money and advertising. This thread was not intended to display my consequence or anger, but give those ppl with ATI-Cards some input. There is still hope, that an adjusted driver (its not a damn fix!!) will pull it. So keep hoping if you want to play this game, not purchasing a console. In my case: R* kiss my ass smile.gif

This post has been edited by XLM1 on Dec 2 2008, 12:10
PM
  Top
 

 
P-Thunder.  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 12:09
Quote Post


UK and proud.
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Aug 6, 2008

uk.gif

XXXXX



You failed to mention if you tested on a Nvidia machine. Did you?
PM
  Top
 

 
Cojage  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 12:10
Quote Post


Trick
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Nov 26, 2008

nl.gif

XXXXX



People with nvidia cards also have problems though.
And yeah, did you test it on a nvidia card too?
PM
  Top
 

 
Homer Simpson  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 12:11
Quote Post


Mod God(Retired) & Beer Drinker
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: May 22, 2002

uk.gif

XXXXX



If you look around there are people with Nvidia cards with the same problems.
PM
  Top
 

 
Tomern11  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 12:13
Quote Post


UKIVCLAN.TK
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Aug 6, 2008

ie.gif

XXXXX



Damn, R*, you are very dissapointing!
PM
  Top
 

 
XLM1  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 12:13
Quote Post


PC gamer union
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: May 3, 2008

gr.gif

XXXXX



We tested a 8800GTS, was fine on a Q6600 and 4Gigs of Ram, having 40fps (due to some adjustments in Dx and Settings), but overall quality was good on 1240x! I also called someone who has a 9800GTX. I didnīt have much time to talk to him, since he wanted to play the game biggrin.gif

EDIT: Thaty why i also stated, that it needs a good CPU too. Having a NVIDIA on a low-end rig, doesnīt mean it still runs better than an ATI on a high rig. But on same rigs, NVIDIA wins the prize.
PM
  Top
 

 
mkey82  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 12:14
Quote Post


Riiiiiiight...
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Feb 14, 2008

Member Award




PC gamer union comrade, welcome back biggrin.gif

Thanks for the info. They are just suckers for exclusivity, I guess...
Users WebsitePM
  Top
 

 
iristrauma  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 12:14
Quote Post


Rat
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: May 1, 2008

XXXXX



Now you got me worried.. I got a HD 4850 and will be furious if it dosent run the game at least on Medium/High.

Adding to that I also got a AMD 6000+ X2 and 4 gigs of 800mhz Ram..

If I have problems I will post details.. sleepy.gif

This post has been edited by iristrauma on Dec 2 2008, 12:17
PM
  Top
 

 
hellfire500  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 12:17
Quote Post


Snitch
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Jun 16, 2008

gadsden.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (iristrauma @ Dec 2 2008, 12:14)
Now you got me worried.. I got a HD 4850 and will be furious if it dosent run the game at least on Medium/High.

I have a HD 2900 XT (512)... in the worst case scenario im ready to play it at 800x600
PM
  Top
 

 
XLM1  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 12:24
Quote Post


PC gamer union
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: May 3, 2008

gr.gif

XXXXX



Let me put things straight: ATI user still can play the game! But what i was trying to state is, that having a good rig doesnīt guarantee good graphics / fps, when you have an ATI. There might be also some problems with NVIDIA ( on the 8800GTS we only occured some flackering of the leaves), but compared so the problems of good ATI cards (mspaint-shadows, AA problems etc.), it still has better graphics and performance! Iīm saying this, having in mind that Resolutions of 800x and low-settings arent the way the game is meant to be played ( biggrin.gif what an ironical sentence).
PM
  Top
 

 
Tomern11  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 13:20
Quote Post


UKIVCLAN.TK
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Aug 6, 2008

ie.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (XLM1 @ Dec 2 2008, 12:24)
Let me put things straight: ATI user still can play the game! But what i was trying to state is, that having a good rig doesnīt guarantee good graphics / fps, when you have an ATI. There might be also some problems with NVIDIA ( on the 8800GTS we only occured some flackering of the leaves), but compared so the problems of good ATI cards (mspaint-shadows, AA problems etc.), it still has better graphics and performance! Iīm saying this, having in mind that Resolutions of 800x and low-settings arent the way the game is meant to be played ( biggrin.gif what an ironical sentence).

So if i have an core 2 quad 2.4 GHz, 3 GB RAM, and an ATI radeon 3870 HD 512 mb i'll hardly max it?!
PM
  Top
 

 
Malik  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 13:52
Quote Post


IV
Group Icon
Group: BUSTED!
Joined: Feb 10, 2008

nl.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (Tomern11 @ Dec 2 2008, 13:20)
QUOTE (XLM1 @ Dec 2 2008, 12:24)
Let me put things straight: ATI user still can play the game! But what i was trying to state is, that having a good rig doesnīt guarantee good graphics / fps, when you have an ATI. There might be also some problems with NVIDIA ( on the 8800GTS we only occured some flackering of the leaves), but compared so the problems of good ATI cards (mspaint-shadows, AA problems etc.), it still has better graphics and performance! Iīm saying this, having in mind that Resolutions of 800x and low-settings arent the way the game is meant to be played (  biggrin.gif  what an ironical sentence).

So if i have an core 2 quad 2.4 GHz, 3 GB RAM, and an ATI radeon 3870 HD 512 mb i'll hardly max it?!

ull hardly low-medium it
PM
  Top
 

 
Skiron90  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 16:54
Quote Post


Player Hater
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Nov 26, 2008

XXXXX



Hey Guys,
I have a dual core 3.14, 4gb Ram and a ATI3870 Crossfire (2x).
Will the game run on my pc? After your Post i dont worry about high resolutions and details.. but now i just hope that it will run! please tell me that it will run =,(
PM
  Top
 

 
Dillyracer  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 16:59
Quote Post


citizen of lost heaven
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Jul 30, 2005

be.gif

XXXXX



We could expect this, since the game wouldn't even run on ATI 2 months ago.
PMMSN
  Top
 

 
GTA_XP  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 17:07
Quote Post


Homie
Group Icon
Group: BUSTED!
Joined: Jan 14, 2008

mw.gif

XXXXX



Why this guy plays GTA4pc on an ATI card?

http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=9w5CQRlO430
PM
  Top
 

 
Homer Simpson  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 17:12
Quote Post


Mod God(Retired) & Beer Drinker
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: May 22, 2002

uk.gif

XXXXX



He's just added a new video which shows him Maxing the details in game without any framrate problems. (single HD4870 running)

http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=bO42LSjRhfM&fmt=18

His Specs..
Windows XP SP3
Core 2 Duo 8400 @ 3.0GHz
3.25GB RAM
Radeon HD4870

This post has been edited by Homer Simpson on Dec 2 2008, 17:15
PM
  Top
 

 
GTA_XP  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 17:16
Quote Post


Homie
Group Icon
Group: BUSTED!
Joined: Jan 14, 2008

mw.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (Homer Simpson @ Dec 2 2008, 17:12)
He's just added a new video which shows him Maxing the details in game without any framrate problems. (single HD4870 running)

http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=bO42LSjRhfM&fmt=18

His Specs..
Windows XP SP3
Core 2 Duo 8400 @ 3.0GHz
3.25GB RAM
Radeon HD4870

No confused.gif
There is no traffic, thats very stupid and horrible.
No traffic in GTA is suicidal.gif suicidal.gif suicidal.gif suicidal.gif icon13.gif icon13.gif icon13.gif
PM
  Top
 

 
Illousion  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 17:16
Quote Post


Over the hills and far away
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Jan 13, 2008

sd.gif

XXXXX



Gentlemen i am sorry to hijack the thread like this but god damned! I have a 9800GT and why in the name of crap can't i get over 10 FPS?
Users WebsitePM
  Top
 

 
Homer Simpson  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 17:23
Quote Post


Mod God(Retired) & Beer Drinker
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: May 22, 2002

uk.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (GTA_XP @ Dec 2 2008, 17:16)
QUOTE (Homer Simpson @ Dec 2 2008, 17:12)
He's just added a new video which shows him Maxing the details in game without any framrate problems. (single HD4870 running)

http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=bO42LSjRhfM&fmt=18

His Specs..
Windows XP SP3
Core 2 Duo 8400 @ 3.0GHz
3.25GB RAM
Radeon HD4870

No confused.gif
There is no traffic, thats very stupid and horrible.
No traffic in GTA is suicidal.gif suicidal.gif suicidal.gif suicidal.gif icon13.gif icon13.gif icon13.gif

lol.. you need to watch the new one I posted for more than 30secs... it starts off with traffic density set to 1% then at 30secs in he changes all settings to 100% then you see loads of traffic once he starts driving..
PM
  Top
 

 
GTA_XP  
Posted: Dec 2 2008, 17:27
Quote Post


Homie
Group Icon
Group: BUSTED!
Joined: Jan 14, 2008

mw.gif

XXXXX



QUOTE (Homer Simpson @ Dec 2 2008, 17:23)
QUOTE (GTA_XP @ Dec 2 2008, 17:16)
QUOTE (Homer Simpson @ Dec 2 2008, 17:12)
He's just added a new video which shows him Maxing the details in game without any framrate problems. (single HD4870 running)

http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=bO42LSjRhfM&fmt=18

His Specs..
Windows XP SP3
Core 2 Duo 8400 @ 3.0GHz
3.25GB RAM
Radeon HD4870

No confused.gif
There is no traffic, thats very stupid and horrible.
No traffic in GTA is suicidal.gif suicidal.gif suicidal.gif suicidal.gif icon13.gif icon13.gif icon13.gif

lol.. you need to watch the new one I posted for more than 30secs... it starts off with traffic density set to 1% then at 30secs in he changes all settings to 100% then you see loads of traffic once he starts driving..

Wow! How?!
You see the differents wow.gif
PM
  Top
 

 
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (3) [1] 2 3  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll
Search topic for posted by (exact match)



 
IMG IMG
     

 
     
Message Boards and Forums Directory