What I can say is that this is the worst review I have ever read. They didn't go in depth with why it was so bad, what the gameplay was like, graphics etc. It was clearly obvious to me that they took their frustration out of having to meet this deadline of completing and reviewing it by giving it a bad score. Let's hope IGN give a good and in-depth review
This post has been edited by AvecMon on Oct 27 2006, 18:01
Meanwhile, games such as Scarface and Saints Row have been cherry-picking the best bits, trying to make games of the same scale but combined with greater ease of play.
I stopped reading the review there. How in the hell can you compare a current gen game to a next gen game????
I WILL rule the world some day Group: Members
Joined: May 15, 2005
Hmm... I think it's too early to judge his review, I mean none of us have played the game, so how can we judge his review to be bad. Yea the other sites gave it a bigger score. But there will always be differences in opinions and I don't think reviewers give grades just because they're evil... But I must admit he didn't get much into detail, in his judgement...
Hemi Powered Group: Andolini Mafia Family
Joined: May 9, 2006
GamesRadar, never even heard of it. YoStone has a point, but, I hate reviewers, I take my own opinion on games. Like BLACK, got bad reviews, but I thought it kicked ass. Plus thi IS a GTA game, so it's good by default.
I've always trusted and visited GamesRadar as I thought they had one of the most best gaming coverage. Heck, they're hosted by the same company thats publishes several major gaming magazines (such as the Official UK PS2 Magazine and the PSM3 Magazine). However ever since I saw this half hearted review, my respect for them has greatly taken a deep plunge into the sea.