IMG

 
IMG
IMG   IMG
  Welcome to GTAForums! Be sure to check out the Grand Theft Auto V Forum.

You are not registered! (If you are, click here to login) Registering is fast, free and easy and allows you to instantly reply to any topic on GTAForums.
Why wait? Click here to register your own unique username and become part of the ever-growing community!


( Log In | Register | Revalidate Validation E-mail )
Quick Log-In:
  IMG
       
>
Forum Rules Attention:

Welcome to the GTA: Liberty City forum. This forum is led by SteaVor, Craig Kostelecky, Y_Less, and ModelingMan.
Please take the time to read the pinned GTA:LC Forum Rules & Directory before progressing any further into the forum.

The following topics are of most importance here, and are outlined in the forum directory:

Download GTA:LC · Checklist For GTA: Liberty City Final · Help & Questions Topic · Bugs, Glitches, and Incompletes · Meet The Team · Screenshots and videos

IRC Modding Chatroom (Don't have an IRC client? Click here.)



Pages: (5) [1] 2 3 ... Last »  ( Go to first unread post ) Closed TopicStart new topicStart Poll

 MAJOR RELEASE HOSTING

 who has the webspace and bandwidth?
 
Demarest  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 11:56
Quote Post


what could be
Group Icon
Group: BUSTED!
Joined: Jul 12, 2003

XXXXX



This thread is for the discussion of where to host major releases such as our first beta and the like. I know, anybody can say Filplanet and things like that. But I'm curious to hear about who has or has access to hosting with large file size allotments and large bandwidth capabilities? This will be most necessary for our first beta with subsequent releases most likely tapering off in terms of server demand. Post as many as you have/know so that we can even get mirrors going.
Users WebsitePMAOL
  Top
 

 
Luke  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 12:01
Quote Post


suckmyrocket
Group Icon
Group: Network Admins
Joined: Dec 1, 2003

pride.gif

Member Award




Sebsz is hosting my site for me (got talking, he offered) and i have 50mb for that. Its not that quick though at the moment (256 upload) but anyone who wants me to upload a file there, just let me know.

EDIT: Im doing a bit of PHP recently, maybe ill make an upload form for the teammembers, doesnt mean anyone has to use it, just good practice for me biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by Smithers2 on Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 12:01
Users WebsitePM
  Top
 

 
Calzinger  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 12:47
Quote Post


Player Hater
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Feb 7, 2004

XXXXX



Hello. I pay for a provider that offers me 1GB webspace and 50GB bandwith per month. If you would like, I can give you your own subdomain, split you 200 megs of webspace, and you can use all of the bandwith you need. You can have email accounts if you would like as well. If you would like to take on the offer, please let me know.
PM
  Top
 

 
Craig Kostelecky  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 12:49
Quote Post


GTA:LC Team Leader
Group Icon
Group: The Connection
Joined: Jan 28, 2004

us.gif

Member Award




I don't know him personally, but The Borg hosts several downloads. You might want to ask him if you can't find anywhere else.

This post has been edited by CraigKostelecky on Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 13:13
Users WebsitePMAOLYahooICQ
  Top
 

 
Outback  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 12:55
Quote Post


GTA:LC Team
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Dec 20, 2003

us.gif

XXXXX



I have plenty of space on my site for whatever anyone needs hosted (related to this mod, ofcourse). I have 5 gigs of bandwidth a month that's pretty much going to waste right now.

I also wouldn't have any problems setting up an upload system of some sort for mod contributors, whether on my space or someone else's.

This post has been edited by [4D]Outback on Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 12:59
Users WebsitePM
  Top
 

 
Blunted1  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 12:58
Quote Post


Snitch
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Jan 31, 2004

XXXXX



Well I personally know Calzinger, I asked him to come here and make that offer.
He is an excellent web host, and you can check out his site and forums if you need proof of that.
He is makeing an excellent offer and from what he has said I don't know what more you could ask for confused.gif

I am not sure about the borg or any other download site, but I'm not sure where you will find this kind of offer for free, especially haveing it knock at your door so you don't have to do any searching.

Again, I can vouche for Calzinger, he is a great guy... and yes I did ask him to come here as soon as I found out you needed web space.
PM
  Top
 

 
Outback  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 13:14
Quote Post


GTA:LC Team
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Dec 20, 2003

us.gif

XXXXX



Seeing as we have the forums now, the actual website isn't really needed, but file hosting still is. And I can say from personal experience that having webspace where bandwidth isn't a concern is a Godsend.

My 5 gigs would be fine for updates and fixes, but from the interest in this project, I'm afraid it would disappear all too quickly with the main release(s).

I'd be more than happy to work with Smithers2 and Calzinger to set up a file management system that all contributors can benefit from.
Users WebsitePM
  Top
 

 
Blunted1  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 13:25
Quote Post


Snitch
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Jan 31, 2004

XXXXX



QUOTE ([4D]Outback @ Feb 7 2004, 13:14)
Seeing as we have the forums now, the actual website isn't really needed, but file hosting still is. And I can say from personal experience that having webspace where bandwidth isn't a concern is a Godsend.

My 5 gigs would be fine for updates and fixes, but from the interest in this project, I'm afraid it would disappear all too quickly with the main release(s).

I'd be more than happy to work with Smithers2 and Calzinger to set up a file management system that all contributors can benefit from.

This sounds the most benifical to everyone from my view.

Smithers2 does not have enough space to host the actual release, but has plenty for the updates and patches.

Outback and calzinger could each host the release itself, and could post links to each others sites, then one could be used as a mirror or alternate download site.

Nah, forget an actual website, the file hosting is more than adeqaute with this new sub-forum smile.gif
PM
  Top
 

 
Demarest  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 13:54
Quote Post


what could be
Group Icon
Group: BUSTED!
Joined: Jul 12, 2003

XXXXX



Just keep in mind that there will be a difference between updates and major releases. For now, we've all done fine with releasing our fixes one way or another. But with the first beta on the horizon, this is a topic we need to discuss now! Sounds like we have some options and having mirrors will be nice. For this reason, we should probably start by releasing the beta link ONLY TO KEY PEOPLE and only on one host for beta testing. Once the testing is "complete", then release the link to the public as well as mirrors. That way we don't have to chase down mirrors etc with little fixes here and there as we discover them. Of course in the end, anybody wanting to DL our work will in effect be beta testing smile.gif
Users WebsitePMAOL
  Top
 

 
Blunted1  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 16:00
Quote Post


Snitch
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Jan 31, 2004

XXXXX



If a release is going to be a short while before the public gets their hands on it, then maybe we should consider gathering all the patches and fixes and organize them.

One big thing that comes to mind is collecting all the IMG files and bundling everything before a certain date (whatever that days date may be) in one package so people dont have to worry about putting old fixes over new ones.

It would be dead simple, the only thing that would take anytime at all is an install script, but that wouldn't even take too long.

Maybe collect the up-to-date contents of the Data folder and package them together.

That way people would be downloading a total of like three or four fixes instead of twenty that hey have to decipher which order to install in.

[then again, I guess you would be half way to a release after all that anyways, maybe too much work for the benifit it will create? It would be pretty easy though, compared to the time and effort it will save people who have no idea what they are doing.]

This post has been edited by Blunted1 on Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 16:02
PM
  Top
 

 
Demarest  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 16:20
Quote Post


what could be
Group Icon
Group: BUSTED!
Joined: Jul 12, 2003

XXXXX



QUOTE (Blunted1 @ Feb 7 2004, 11:00)
If a release is going to be a short while before the public gets their hands on it, then maybe we should consider gathering all the patches and fixes and organize them.

It's already being worked on. But I wouldn't dare call the process simple or easy. With so many people contributing and certain files being overwritten many times over for different reasons, it takes to to track down and joing the info. One excellent example would be paths.ipl. It dictates ALL the paths in the game. kipo was working on SSV to avoid interfering with Knux's work in Portland. When Knux released Portland and kipo released SSV, one would then have to JOIN the two files to be able to have a release version. This example is just text, so joining is fairly simple. But the various IPL, IDE, and IMG versions will take time to track and compile. I have much respect for everybody involved in THAT effort as I understand exactly how hair-pulling it's going to be.
Users WebsitePMAOL
  Top
 

 
killer.ip  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 16:22
Quote Post


GTA:LC Moderator
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Aug 30, 2003

XXXXX



Don't worry Blunted1, I've been on the case with this one for a while... the latest versions of all the updates released so far have already been compiled and we're just waiting for the last few to be released before I can add them to complete the beta for in-house testing.

It's not been decided whether the release will consist of a manual install or an automatic installer, either way with a readme included it should be fairly foolproof. I personally would enjoy seeing the use of an installer, but as it's only necessary to delete /data, /models, /Icons & /TEXT then replace them with our updated versions it may not be wholly necessary.

As Dem said, the release is on the horizon, but you can appreciate a need for quality control and this is our overriding concern at this time. smile.gif
Users WebsitePM
  Top
 

 
Blunted1  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 19:24
Quote Post


Snitch
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Jan 31, 2004

XXXXX



QUOTE (killer.ip @ Feb 7 2004, 16:22)
Don't worry Blunted1, I've been on the case with this one for a while... the latest versions of all the updates released so far have already been compiled and we're just waiting for the last few to be released before I can add them to complete the beta for in-house testing.

It's not been decided whether the release will consist of a manual install or an automatic installer, either way with a readme included it should be fairly foolproof. I personally would enjoy seeing the use of an installer, but as it's only necessary to delete /data, /models, /Icons & /TEXT then replace them with our updated versions it may not be wholly necessary.

As Dem said, the release is on the horizon, but you can appreciate a need for quality control and this is our overriding concern at this time. smile.gif

Ok first off I am not sure where that comment came from Dem,
QUOTE
But I wouldn't dare call the process simple or easy


I am not sure if I am reading you wrong myself, but if you think I implied that compileing a release was simple then I think you took me completily wrong.
As far as your example, those have been combined. I am talking about all existing updates that are working and ready to install with ease.... if people want to mess around with combineing half peices of work that is their own agenda (I will gladly wait for finished peices of work rather than do work that will be redone by someone better and released within a week anyway), I want to make this as easy as possible for people who have never seen your site before.
[what I suggested is what I am in the works of doing for myself should I ever choose to reinstall all of this or pass it on to a friend]


As for Killer.IP, thank you very much for answering my question.
I would suggest manual install, it is always better and you would have to be more than a noob to screw it up if you set it all up right.

The IMG, obviously, would have an install script, that is automatic enough.
And the rest of the files are fairly simple to copy over the existing ones, especially if you set it all up in subfolders so all they have to do is copy one folder over their root directory and then run Mod Installer for the IMG files, rebuild your archive and you are done.

Much simpler than all those updates and ordering them correctly.

Thanks Killer.IP smile.gif

This post has been edited by Blunted1 on Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 19:27
PM
  Top
 

 
Outback  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 19:33
Quote Post


GTA:LC Team
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Dec 20, 2003

us.gif

XXXXX



Any major release would be intended as a fresh install, and would not need any sort of scripts for the IMG file, as the included version would already be built with the latest files.

This post has been edited by [4D]Outback on Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 19:34
Users WebsitePM
  Top
 

 
killer.ip  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 19:41
Quote Post


GTA:LC Moderator
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Aug 30, 2003

XXXXX



Blunted1 has brought up an interesting point though. As you recall WO's release contained a pre-built gta3.img which made the download weigh in at 70Mb. As far as I know this has been the way we always intended to release GTA3:LC, this shouldn't change as it means we will have final control over making sure everything is in the correct place.

But downloading 70Mb is a tall order if you're on a slower connection, a 2nd smaller package with just the updated .dff's and .txd's for the gta3.img & required installscript (plus contents of other folders) would give an extra option for those stuck on 56k.

Just an idea at this point. smile.gif
Users WebsitePM
  Top
 

 
Outback  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 20:00
Quote Post


GTA:LC Team
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Dec 20, 2003

us.gif

XXXXX



killer.ip: You got a point there, but I'm having mixed feelings about that.

Well, ofcourse, doing that would decrease the download size. But on the other hand, having a slower connection also decreases the preferred margin of error and increase the number of ppl (re: noobs) complaining cuz they can't get it to install right and that it took them for-freakin-ever to download and yadda yadda.

Plus, the Mod Installer would take forever and a day to inject all the needed files into the IMG.

Maybe a disclaimer is in order. smile.gif "If you don't know what you need to do with the included files, you're better off downloading the full version."

EDIT. Seem we've sidetracked two threads with this already. Maybe the installer discussion deserves a thread of its own?

This post has been edited by [4D]Outback on Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 20:10
Users WebsitePM
  Top
 

 
killer.ip  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 20:16
Quote Post


GTA:LC Moderator
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Aug 30, 2003

XXXXX



At the moment we're looking at roughly 1100 new files, tough to tell at this point with many still due to come in. I agree, it will take an age... but the installscript is easy enough to make, bit of cut & pasting should do the trick. I'll run some benchmarks on a couple of the machines we've got down here just to see what sort of timescale we're looking at.

A new thread for the installer discussion sounds like a good idea, if you could post it and add as much information as we've already discussed that would be great. In the meantime I'll head off to get that data just to see if the Mod Installer option is viable.

I totally agree with the disclaimer by the way. biggrin.gif
Users WebsitePM
  Top
 

 
The_Borg  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 20:49
Quote Post


Crackhead
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: May 17, 2003

XXXXX



Nice to be mentioned here and yes I like to host your beta too. Feel free to contact me at admin@theborggaming.com.

And keep it up, your project is really promising smile.gif .
Users WebsitePM
  Top
 

 
Blunted1  
Posted: Saturday, Feb 7 2004, 23:50
Quote Post


Snitch
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Jan 31, 2004

XXXXX



Whoa, whoa, whoa.... lets all take a look at what Blunted1 said and analyze it shall we (oh wait thats me wow.gif )....
Anyways....

What I said was IN THE MEANTIME, as a replacement for a release, in order to make installing patches easier.....
We should compile as much of the patches into smaler packages, possibly only one.

Now I like Kiler.IP's idea for an ALTERNATE release install method that would require less download and be easier on 56k users and such. That is brilliant Killer.IP way to take my idea to the next level...

BUT in the meantime.... could we possibly combine all the IMG's and possibly the rest while we're at it, into a smaller, more caontained update package that is easier to install than 20 patches that must be installed in a correct sequence.

Please, I know I write a lot at a time, but please read what I have to say and do your best to understand, I try to articulate the best I can for just that reason.


(I'm just at a loss as to how someone could respond to my idea for patches BEFORE a release is made, with this...
QUOTE
Any major release would be intended as a fresh install, and would not need any sort of scripts for the IMG file, as the included version would already be built with the latest files.
.
I am sorry but that makes no sense whatssoever... atleast it caused Killer.IP to come up with that killer idea tounge.gif )
PM
  Top
 

 
Outback  
Posted: Sunday, Feb 8 2004, 00:04
Quote Post


GTA:LC Team
Group Icon
Group: Members
Joined: Dec 20, 2003

us.gif

XXXXX



If there was going to be an interim release, it would have been said and done with already.

And please, stop making the assumption that people that don't agree with you aren't understanding you. I understood you perfectly fine, TYVM.

This post has been edited by [4D]Outback on Sunday, Feb 8 2004, 00:05
Users WebsitePM
  Top
 

 

0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

0 Members:

Pages: (5) [1] 2 3 ... Last »

Topic Options Closed TopicStart new topicStart Poll
Search topic for posted by (exact match)



 
IMG IMG