[Jokesminus]

QUOTE (Azazel @ Friday, Sep 28 2012, 19:04)

QUOTE (Swampert @ Friday, Sep 28 2012, 19:27) If your mom says "I put a turkey sandwich in your lunchbox" before you run to catch the school bus, that means you have a turkey sandwich in your lunchbox. It doesn't mean there isn't also an apple, or a pudding cup, or a juice box, or one of those stupid cheese things you peel apart. Granted, but SF or LV wouldn't be apples or juice boxes, they would be turkey sandwiches of their own.

But what happens if your apple juice bursts onto your turkey sandwiches then you get apple and turkey flavoured sandwiches.

[Choco Taco]

QUOTE (Swampert @ Friday, Sep 28 2012, 12:27)

those stupid cheese things you peel apart

Don't call them stupid! I like those things.

[03011300]

I just know about not done Venturas, Rockstar Logo Movie done, The Flashbulb - Undiscovered Colours Intro, Sunrise Avenue - Vinewood Hills Outro, and work done in 75%...

[gtamann123]

It will be Los Santos, San Fierro, Las Venturas, San Diego, Vice City, Phoenix, Houston, Salt Lake City, Denver, Chicago, St. Louis, Minneapolis/St. paul, And Dallas. Anything less is a dissapointment.

This is how crazy some people seem. Wouldnt you rather just see R* focus on making one really good big detailed city with good countryside instead of making 3 smaller less detailed cities? And if they did include another city it probably wouldnt be those two. probably something more realistic like San Diego. LV is a slight posibility as the city on the eastern stretches of the desert. I believe the Inland empire has a good chance of showing up since there is evidence to support Palm Springs and a dersert area.

[Darth_Starkiller]

Maybe not the three cities, but San Fierro? The cablecar is listed at the MP3 list. And we know where it was located. Altough I'll probably be disappointed.

[damian001]

QUOTE (Darth_Starkiller @ Friday, Sep 28 2012, 14:51)

Maybe not the three cities, but San Fierro? The cablecar is listed at the MP3 list. And we know where it was located. Altough I'll probably be disappointed.

Cablecars were probably left over from IV.

This post has been edited by damian001 on Friday, Sep 28 2012, 23:16

[Neo Arcadia]

QUOTE (gtamann123 @ Friday, Sep 28 2012, 17:16)

Wouldnt you rather just see R* focus on making one really good big detailed city with good countryside instead of making 3 smaller less detailed cities?

Hell no. The idea that one enormous, bloated city with loads and loads of wasted space and neighborhoods that all end up feeling the same... To be considered better than three smaller cities that use all of their space and provide all sorts of different vibes, is nothing short of insanity. I've seen pics of Los Angeles, and that flat urban sprawl is a complete nightmare. There's a reason San Francisco was the one originally paired with Liberty/Vice, and San Andreas had three cities...

[Darrel]

It would be best if you accept that it will not have SF or LV included. Then you will not be disappointed.

That does not mean there will be just Los Santos though. There could be the likes of San Diego, but on a smaller scale.

I would rather a big sized city, (but not too large) packed to the brim with detail, bursting with life. Than 3 or more medium sized ones with repeated textures, not as good as they could have been portrayed.

This post has been edited by Darrel on Friday, Sep 28 2012, 23:55

[abottig]

Hey OP, "Southern California".

[JStarr31]

What i've noticed...

Everybody seems to fail in realizing is that the scale of the cities has changed not the size of the cities. Everybody keeps saying that IV's Liberty City is smaller than San Andreas by a lot when in fact it wasn't, the map "area" itself stayed the same but the scale of all objects on the map were "shrunk" so to speak.

Look at it like this, imagine a large room that can hold on 100 boxes that are all 1 square foot, now imagine all those boxes being the buildings of the city. Now if we decrease the size of every box in half then we can now fit 200 boxes as opposed to 100 boxes. Did the room get bigger or did everything in the room just get smaller? And that's basically what happened to Liberty City vs. San Andreas. Liberty city is in fact almost the same size land/area/square footage of San Andreas, but the buildings and scale of everything on the map (including the metric measurements) was made significantly smaller, making everything appear larger.

Honestly I think Los Santos' map area (excluding coutryside, talking city only) will be the same exact size as Liberty City entire map (maybe slightly larger) only difference will be the river areas being filled in with city and everything built on the map will be scaled smaller giving the appearance of a larger play area. Then add a bunch of countryside, beaches and mountains and we got ourselves a great game

[wojas]

I think it will be the only los santos city. if los santos will be the size of GTA IV is a SF and LV should be of similar size. These three cities would occupy nearly 18 sq. miles. So I believe that los santos is bigger than GTA IV, I guess something about 9sq miles. (I doubt that los santos can be even more. Just 6sq miles city is a big challenge for designers.)